Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC directs RTO to decide SAZ Enterprises’ appeal within 7 days

byNaeem Ullah Tariq
09/11/2016
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court disposed of a petition filed by M/s SAZ Enterprises challenging a tax recovery claim amounting to Rs 135 million made by Islamabad Regional Tax Office (RTO).

A bench, comprising Justice Aamer Farooq, heard the tax reference and issued seven-day deadline for the RTO to hear and decide M/s SAZ Enterprises’ application pending with the RTO.

You might also like

World Bank mission reviews Sukkur Barrage project

18/06/2026

Punjab slashes annual development Budget by 40pc

18/06/2026

The bench also restricted the RTO from recovering Rs 135,000,000, outstanding tax amount from M/s SAZ Enterprises. The appeal was pending before the Inland Revenue (appeals) commissioner, the petitioner mentioned.

The company had made RTO chief commissioner, IR assistant commissioner, IR (appeals) commissioner and Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) chairman respondents in the case.

It had challenged a show cause notice dated August 03, 2016 issued by the assistant commissioner under sections of Sales Tax Act, 1990 for recovery of Rs 135,000,000.

The petitioner had prayed the court to restrict the department from taking any coercive action for realising the recovery of said amount from the appellant and suspend the notice until the decision of appeals.

M/S SAZ Enterprises submitted with the court that the impugned order was issued under mala fide intentions and had no legal standing or authority and the court may decide on relief which it deemed appropriate in this regard. It also stated that due legal course was not followed by the department in issuing the order.

The appellant had also mentioned that departmental obligations were not met amid processing the notice of recovery demand while later the adjudication did not addressed grievances of the appellant too.

Related Stories

World Bank mission reviews Sukkur Barrage project

byCT Report
18/06/2026

SUKKUR: A World Bank Implementation Support Mission on Wednesday visited the Sukkur Barrage Rehabilitation Project to assess on-ground progress and...

Punjab slashes annual development Budget by 40pc

byCT Report
18/06/2026

LAHORE: The Punjab government has announced a significantly smaller Annual Development Program (ADP) for fiscal year 2026-27, allocating Rs. 752...

BMP questions budget’s ambitious tax target, fears more reliance on levies

byCT Report
18/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry’s (FPCCI) Businessmen Panel (BMP) has questioned the government’s ambitious budget...

Balochistan presents Rs1.089tr surplus budget for FY2026-27

byCT Report
18/06/2026

QUETTA: The Balochistan government on Wednesday presented a Rs1.089 trillion surplus budget for the fiscal year 2026-27, outlining major allocations...

Next Post

FBR’s top brass retiring next year

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.