Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result

Sarawak’s right to repossess petroleum resources

byCT Report
16/11/2016
in Uncategorized
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

KUALA LUMPUR: Sarawak came together with Sabah, Singapore, and Malaya, supposedly partners of equal status, to form Malaysia pursuant to the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63), with its territory, including its own continental shelf and all attached resources, intact.

The assurances of this fact and intent in the new federation were stated clearly by the new prime minister himself (fig.1), to allay any doubt as to the nature of the union between the parties concerned: “…When the Borneo territories become of Malaysia, they will cease to be a colony of Britain, and they will not be a colony of Malaya – I thought I made it clear – they will be partners of equal status.”

You might also like

Pakistan, Uzbekistan move to expand trade ties, explore livestock and industrial cooperation

04/05/2026

Arif Habib-led consortium moves to acquire remaining 25pc stake in PIA

04/05/2026

Nothing was mentioned about Sarawak’s petroleum resources in the Inter-Governmental Committee Report or the subsequent Malaysia Agreement 1963. These naturally, legally and constitutionally came under the state just like land and other matters such as minerals that were included within that land.

As J C Fong, former Sarawak state attorney-general stated in his book (fig. 2), “…the two states continued to exercise rights over petroleum found within its (sic) territories, including those found offshore”. Those rights were to be taken away via the device of the Petroleum Development Act 1974, a device that, although passed by Parliament, did not follow a substantive provision of the Federal Constitution, and was therefore unconstitutional, null and void and of no legal effect.

Related Stories

Pakistan, Uzbekistan move to expand trade ties, explore livestock and industrial cooperation

byCT Report
04/05/2026

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and Uzbekistan agreed to deepen economic cooperation across multiple sectors, including trade, industry and investment, during a meeting...

Arif Habib-led consortium moves to acquire remaining 25pc stake in PIA

byCT Report
04/05/2026

KARACHI: The consortium led by Arif Habib Corporation Limited has notified the Privatization Commission of its intent to acquire the...

FBR clears long-pending tax refund within three weeks on FTO orders

byCT Report
04/05/2026

ISLAMABAD: In a notable example of administrative responsiveness, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Islamabad field formation has processed a...

FBR fails to submit reply in LHC petition against reward scheme

byCT Report
04/05/2026

LAHORE: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has yet to file written comments before the Lahore High Court (LHC) in...

Next Post

Petronas profit jumps on lower impairment costs

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.