Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC hears couple of tax matters during first week of Feb

byNaeem Ullah Tariq
13/02/2017
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has adjourned the hearing of a couple of important tax matters during recent week of February. M/s Biafo Industries and M/s Pakistan Tobacco Company Limited had filed these cases.

An IHC division bench comprising Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurengzeb heard the case of M/s Biafo Industries while Justice Aamer Farooq heard the case of M/s Pakistan Tobacco Company.

You might also like

SBP dollar purchases fall to 16-month low at $154m

02/09/2026

Pakistan, Kyrgyzstan set trade target of $200m, sign 16 agreements

02/09/2026

M/s Biafo Industries had filed the case challenging a recovery claim of Rs 783.3 million made by the Large Taxpayers Unit, Islamabad.

An IHC division bench comprising Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurengzeb heard the case filed by M/s Pakistan Tobacco Company Limited. Through the petition, M/s Pakistan Tobacco Company Limited had challenged imposition of ‘Super Tax regime 2015.’

Super tax is being imposed for collecting funds for rehabilitation of temporarily displaced persons under provisions of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 after inserting section 4-B of Finance Act, 2015 in the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

The petition challenged the imposition of super tax, stating that double tax was being charged under section 4-B of Finance Act, 2015 as the Federal Board of Revenue was using the said section (4-B) of Finance Act, 2015 for charging of super tax separately under Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Hence, the section was being used to charge tax twice, petitioner stated.

The company had filed the case against officers of the Ministry of Finance and the Federal Board of Revenue.

Related Stories

SBP dollar purchases fall to 16-month low at $154m

byCT Report
02/09/2026

KARACHI: The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) significantly reduced its dollar purchases from the interbank foreign exchange market in May,...

Pakistan, Kyrgyzstan set trade target of $200m, sign 16 agreements

byCT Report
02/09/2026

BISHKEK: Pakistan and Kyrgyzstan have made significant progress in strengthening bilateral relations, exchanging 16 agreements and memorandums of understanding in...

Federal govt to launch Punjab’s e-Biz portal in Islamabad by December

byCT Report
02/09/2026

LAHORE: The federal government has decided to introduce Punjab's e-Biz portal in Islamabad as part of efforts to simplify business...

Pakistan shifts focus from economic stability to sustainable growth, Aurangzeb tells ADB

byCT Report
02/09/2026

ISLAMABAD: Finance Minister Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb has said Pakistan’s economic priorities are moving from stabilisation towards sustainable and inclusive growth,...

Next Post

IHC dispose of case filed by M/s Orient Power Company in first week of Feb

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.