Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC hears couple of tax matters during first week of Feb

byNaeem Ullah Tariq
13/02/2017
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has adjourned the hearing of a couple of important tax matters during recent week of February. M/s Biafo Industries and M/s Pakistan Tobacco Company Limited had filed these cases.

An IHC division bench comprising Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurengzeb heard the case of M/s Biafo Industries while Justice Aamer Farooq heard the case of M/s Pakistan Tobacco Company.

You might also like

FBR exempts certain POS-compliant footwear supplies from retail price tax

18/07/2026

Tax backlog hits 68,000 despite 24 private members inducted on monthly salaries of up to Rs2.6m; review panel formed

18/07/2026

M/s Biafo Industries had filed the case challenging a recovery claim of Rs 783.3 million made by the Large Taxpayers Unit, Islamabad.

An IHC division bench comprising Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurengzeb heard the case filed by M/s Pakistan Tobacco Company Limited. Through the petition, M/s Pakistan Tobacco Company Limited had challenged imposition of ‘Super Tax regime 2015.’

Super tax is being imposed for collecting funds for rehabilitation of temporarily displaced persons under provisions of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 after inserting section 4-B of Finance Act, 2015 in the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

The petition challenged the imposition of super tax, stating that double tax was being charged under section 4-B of Finance Act, 2015 as the Federal Board of Revenue was using the said section (4-B) of Finance Act, 2015 for charging of super tax separately under Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Hence, the section was being used to charge tax twice, petitioner stated.

The company had filed the case against officers of the Ministry of Finance and the Federal Board of Revenue.

Related Stories

FBR exempts certain POS-compliant footwear supplies from retail price tax

byCT Report
18/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has excluded certain supplies made through digitally integrated and point-of-sale-compliant channels from the...

Tax backlog hits 68,000 despite 24 private members inducted on monthly salaries of up to Rs2.6m; review panel formed

byCT Report
18/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s tax litigation backlog has climbed to around 68,000 cases despite the appointment of 24 private-sector members to the...

Bahrain pulls $30m from Pakistan bonds as Gulf war weighs on foreign investment

byCT Report
18/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: Bahrain withdrew $30 million from Pakistan’s domestic bonds during the first 10 days of FY2026-27 as the Gulf conflict...

Aurangzeb reviews digital overhaul of FBR through Faceless Centre

byCT Report
18/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: Federal Minister for Finance and Revenue, Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb, chaired a meeting to review the implementation roadmap and operational...

Next Post

IHC dispose of case filed by M/s Orient Power Company in first week of Feb

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.