Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC hears couple of tax matters during first week of Feb

byNaeem Ullah Tariq
13/02/2017
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has adjourned the hearing of a couple of important tax matters during recent week of February. M/s Biafo Industries and M/s Pakistan Tobacco Company Limited had filed these cases.

An IHC division bench comprising Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurengzeb heard the case of M/s Biafo Industries while Justice Aamer Farooq heard the case of M/s Pakistan Tobacco Company.

You might also like

SAARC chief urges turning South Asia’s challenges into opportunities

24/04/2026

DG Valuation revises import values for PVC, PU coated vide VR No.2068/2026

24/04/2026

M/s Biafo Industries had filed the case challenging a recovery claim of Rs 783.3 million made by the Large Taxpayers Unit, Islamabad.

An IHC division bench comprising Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurengzeb heard the case filed by M/s Pakistan Tobacco Company Limited. Through the petition, M/s Pakistan Tobacco Company Limited had challenged imposition of ‘Super Tax regime 2015.’

Super tax is being imposed for collecting funds for rehabilitation of temporarily displaced persons under provisions of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 after inserting section 4-B of Finance Act, 2015 in the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

The petition challenged the imposition of super tax, stating that double tax was being charged under section 4-B of Finance Act, 2015 as the Federal Board of Revenue was using the said section (4-B) of Finance Act, 2015 for charging of super tax separately under Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Hence, the section was being used to charge tax twice, petitioner stated.

The company had filed the case against officers of the Ministry of Finance and the Federal Board of Revenue.

Related Stories

SAARC chief urges turning South Asia’s challenges into opportunities

byCT Report
24/04/2026

ISLAMABAD: President of the SAARC Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Chandi Raj Dhakal, has emphasized that South Asia’s economic and...

DG Valuation revises import values for PVC, PU coated vide VR No.2068/2026

byCT Report
24/04/2026

KARACHI: The Directorate General of Customs Valuation has revised customs values for imports of PVC, PU and other coated fabrics...

PM clears NBP’s long-awaited Rs35 per share dividend

byCT Report
24/04/2026

ISLAMABADI: National Bank of Pakistan has received approval for its long-delayed dividend payout after Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif cleared the...

SBP eases import financing rules for oil & LNG amid geopolitical crisis

byCT Report
24/04/2026

KARACHI: The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has revised key foreign exchange instructions to facilitate the import of crude oil,...

Next Post

IHC dispose of case filed by M/s Orient Power Company in first week of Feb

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.