MULTAN: A tax tribunal has upheld the tax authority’s right to correct erroneous assessment orders even if the taxpayer’s return shows losses. The decision is expected to have far-reaching implications for tax disputes in the country.
The case centered on the tax authority’s invocation of Section 66-A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, to amend/correct an original assessment order. The taxpayer had argued that the order, although potentially erroneous, was not prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. However, the tribunal disagreed, holding that both conditions for invoking Section 66-A – the order being erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue were fulfilled.
The taxpayer approached the tribunal under Section 136(2) of the Ordinance, proposing a question of law regarding whether the subsidy granted by the federal government to reimburse losses suffered by it should be treated as a capital receipt or a revenue receipt.
The taxpayer believed that the order passed under Section 66-A of the Ordinance was without lawful authority and jurisdiction as it was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue, as the subsidy granted by the federal government was a capital receipt, not taxable as trading revenue. He said no conditions were attached to the subsidy, and it does not fall under any heads of income under Section 15 of the Ordinance.
According to the tribunal, even if a return shows losses, an assessment can still be prejudicial to revenue interests. Furthermore, any carry-forward loss pursuant to an erroneous assessment order will remain prejudicial to revenue interests.
The tax authority welcomed the decision, stating that it would help prevent taxpayers from exploiting errors in assessment orders to avoid paying taxes.
“This ruling is a significant victory for the tax authority and ensures that taxpayers cannot take advantage of errors to evade taxes,” they added. Tax experts also hailed the decision, saying it would clarify the scope of Section 66-A and tax authority’s powers to correct erroneous assessment orders.
“This ruling provides much-needed clarity on the application of Section 66-A and will help reduce disputes between taxpayers and the tax authority,” said a tax consultant.
