LAHORE: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO), Dr. Asif Jah, has initiated a formal investigation against the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) following a complaint alleging the forceful implementation of SRO 428. This SRO mandates the online integration of businesses and the configuration of retail outlets with the FBR’s e-computerized system, a move that has reportedly burdened taxpayers with heavy costs and raised serious concerns about data privacy.
Sources reliably indicate that the FTO’s decision to order an investigation comes after the FBR’s Policy and Operations wings failed to adequately defend their position during a hearing. The case, filed by advocate Waheed Shahbaz Butt, is officially listed on the FTO website for hearing.
Allegations of Maladministration and Data Privacy Violations
The complaint highlights several critical issues:
Heavy Cost Burden: Taxpayers are allegedly facing significant financial burdens due to the mandatory online integration, which requires them to configure their retail outlets with the FBR’s e-computerized system.
Forced Implementation: The FTO’s investigation will specifically look into the “forceful implementation” of SRO 428, suggesting that businesses may have been compelled to adopt the system without sufficient support or consideration for their operational capacities.
Privacy of Taxpayer Data: A central concern raised by complainant Waheed Shahbaz Butt is the legality of a private company collecting, holding, and utilizing taxpayers’ fiscal data under the guise of online integration. Butt referenced a Supreme Court order (PLD 2021 SC1) that previously directed disciplinary and criminal proceedings against tax officials who contravened Section 216 (privacy of taxpayer data) of the Income Tax Ordinance. This suggests a potential conflict with established legal precedents regarding data confidentiality.
Demands for Transparency and Accountability
To avoid prolonged litigation and wastage of resources, the complainant has urged the FTO to recommend that the FBR provide comprehensive documentation. This includes:
Complete Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and flowcharts detailing the fiscal/tax information provided to the private company selected by the FBR.
Clarification on potential breaches of personal privacy under Section 216 of the law.
Justification for the “exorbitant charges” imposed on taxpayers for this integration.
Details of similar practices in neighboring and other countries to provide context.
Proof of the lawful mandate to nominate a single private company across Pakistan for Point of Sale (POS) activities.
Other ancillary documents/data to demonstrate that there is no favoritism or nepotism on the part of FBR tax employees.
