Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

WAPDA, NEPRA Acts violation: IHC to hear plea against Rs15-40 surcharge of 950MW Neelum-Jhelum project

byadmin
24/11/2014
in Uncategorized
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has been moved against the collection of Neelum-Jhelum surcharge being collected from consumers through electricity bills every month.

The petitioner submitted in the court that the Neelum-Jhelum Surcharge, imposed through a notification on January 4, 2008 and valid till December 31, 2015, was illegally, without jurisdiction and tantamount to abuse of power.

You might also like

Pakistan to get $3b loan from Islamic Trade Financing Corporation

20/10/2024

Lahore I&I & Enforcement anti-smuggling operations achieve record success in early FY 2024-25

10/09/2024

Surcharge of Rs`15-40 is collected from consumers and it increases with units usage.

Citing the Water and Power Ministry secretary and heads of National Electric Power Regularity Authority (Nepra), Water and Power Development Authority (Wapda) and Islamabad Electric Supply Company (Iesco) as respondents, the petition said that presently electricity from the Neelum-Jhelum Power Project was neither being supplied nor utilised by the public, thus its forcible advance payment is unconstitutional.

It also states that the levy is also in violation of Article 157 (2) (b) of the Constitution which provides that a tax on consumption of electricity can only be imposed through a law and that too by the provincial government.

The petitioner also pointed out that none of the relevant laws, such as the Electricity Act 1910, Wapda Act 1958 and the Nepra Act 1997, provide for imposition of surcharge for an under-construction project.

The petitioner requested the court to declare the surcharge illegal and restrain the respondents from collecting any amount in consumers’ monthly bills.

Related Stories

Pakistan to get $3b loan from Islamic Trade Financing Corporation

byCT Report
20/10/2024

ISLAMABAD: Islamic Trade Financing Corporation (ITFC) to provide Pakistan with a $3 billion loan, according to an official statement released...

Lahore I&I & Enforcement anti-smuggling operations achieve record success in early FY 2024-25

byCT Report
10/09/2024

LAHORE:  Regional Directorate of Customs Intelligence & Investigation has demonstrated exceptional performance in the first two months of the fiscal...

ICCI and CDA to join hands for tree plantation drive in Capital

byQaisar Mansoor
09/08/2023

ISLAMABAD: Islamabad Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ICCI) in collaboration with the Capital Development Authority (CDA) would jointly launch a...

Customs Officials Yawar Abbas & Tariq Mehmood kidnapped in Karachi

byCT Report
08/07/2023

KARACHI: Customs Intelligence Officer Yawar Abbas and Customs Preventive Officer Tariq Mehmood who were working against smuggling were kidnapped by...

Next Post

Dar discusses Islamic bonds in UAE, Income Support Fund increases from Rs30b to Rs95b

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.