Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result

2 Customs officers escape gallows over cannabis trafficking

byghadia
25/11/2015
in Uncategorized
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

KUALA LUMPUR: Two Customs enforcement officers escaped the gallows today, after the Federal Court set them free on a charge of trafficking in 6.7kg of cannabis in Padang Besar, Perlis, about four years ago.

A five-man bench chaired by Chief Judge of Malaya, Tan Sri Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin acquitted and discharged Ismail Mansor, 46, and Nazni Seman, 51, after ruling that their conviction was unsafe.

You might also like

FBR to launch faceless tax audit system

13/06/2026

FBR bans PDF financial statements for companies

13/06/2026

He held that the prosecution’s failure to call a material witness, K. Ravindran had created a gap in the prosecution’s case.

The panel, which had Federal Court judges Tan Sri Suriyadi Halim Omar, Datuk Zainun Ali, Tan Sri Abu Samah Nordin and Datuk Zaharah Ibrahim, allowed the duo’s appeal to set aside their conviction and death sentence.

Ismail and Nazni, who were under suspension, were found guilty and sentenced to death by the Kangar High Court on October 9, 2012 with trafficking in the drug at a parking space meant for lorries of a cement factory in Bukit Keteri, Padang Besar in Perlis at 9.30pm on April 27, 2011.

They appealed to the Federal Court after they were unsuccessful in their attempt to set aside their conviction and death sentence at the Court of Appeal, which was dismissed on June 24, last year.

During submissions, counsel Amer Hamzah Arshad representing Ismail, said that evidence showed Ravindran had contacted Nazni and persuaded him to come to the location and his client (Ismail) drove Nazni to the location as he (Nazni) did not know how to drive.

Hisyam Teh Poh Teik argued that his client (Nazni) had no knowledge of the drugs and it was his defence that the actual trafficker was Ravindran who brought the box containing the drugs.

He said it was important for the prosecution to call Ravindran to rebut the defence version and its failure to do so was fatal.

Deputy public prosecutor K. Mangai submitted that there was no necessity to call Ravindran as a witness, in view of overwhelming evidence against the duo.

Related Stories

FBR to launch faceless tax audit system

byCT Report
13/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is set to introduce a faceless audit and assessment system across all four...

FBR bans PDF financial statements for companies

byCT Report
13/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has proposed a major shift toward digital tax administration through the Finance Bill...

SBP unveils first-ever research agenda for 2026-2029

byCT Report
13/06/2026

KARACHI: The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has launched its inaugural Research Agenda for 2026-2029, outlining key research priorities aimed...

Pakistan empowers custom courts to freeze assets in illegal fund transfer trials

byCT Report
13/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistani government has introduced a major legislative amendment through the Finance Bill, 2026, granting Special Judges the authority...

Next Post

Malaysian Customs fails to collect RM12.65mln import duty from Malay vehicles

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.