Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC directs ATIR, LTU to decide appeals by M/s Nayatel in 60 days

byNaeem Ullah Tariq
22/03/2016
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: Justice Aamer Farooq of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has directed the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR) and the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) of the Large Taxpayers Unit to decide the appeal filed by M/s Nayatel (Private) Limited within 60 days.

The IHC judge issued these directives while concluding the hearing of tax reference in which the appellant had challenged the demand, dated-February 17, 2015, of Rs 17.8 million for the tax year 2011-12 under section 7 of the Federal Excise Duty Act, 2005 and provisions of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. The Additional Commissioner Inland Revenue had issued the order.

You might also like

Chinese consortium to expand investment in Pakistan’s capital market infrastructure

15/06/2026

Banks must upload account data to FBR Hub under FY27 Bill

15/06/2026

Challenging the order, the appellant had submitted before the court that the LTU, Islamabad’s officer had issued the order in violation of Rule 60 of Federal Excise Duty Act, 2005.

The appellant complained that amount was recovered prior to the expiry of 30 days provisional limit of issuing the order. Hence, the appellant was deprived of provisional time of 30 days granted to him according to Rule 71 of the Sales Tax Rule, 2006.

Creating demand for Rs 17.8 million, the Additional Commissioner Inland Revenue recovered the dues earlier than the expiry of the provisional 30 days limit on March 17, 2016. The appellant had pleaded that under Rule 60 of the FED Rules, 2005, the appellant should have been given the 30 days to respond.

On the day of the case’s disposal, the court also directed the LTU’s Commissioner Inland Revenue to decide the fate of the application filed by the appellant before him within 60 days.

The court also directed LTU’s Commissioner Inland Revenue to restrain from effecting further recovery of outstanding amount till decision over the plea filed in the department. The Federal Board of Revenue and the LUT’s chief commissioner were also made respondents in the case.

Related Stories

Chinese consortium to expand investment in Pakistan’s capital market infrastructure

byCT Report
15/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: Chinese investors have reaffirmed their long-term commitment to Pakistan’s capital markets following the resolution of key regulatory matters by...

Banks must upload account data to FBR Hub under FY27 Bill

byCT Report
15/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has proposed mandatory electronic data sharing by all banks and Electronic Money Institutions...

FBR Bahawalpur Zone recovers Rs530m in record enforcement drive

byCT Report
15/06/2026

BAHAWALPUR: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Bahawalpur Zone has recovered over Rs530 million in taxes from Islamia University of...

Finance Bill 2026 expands FBR audit powers under sales tax law

byCT Report
15/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Finance Bill 2026 has proposed significant amendments to Section 25 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, granting Inland...

Next Post

IHC adjourns hearing of reference filed by Haidri Beverages

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.