Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC to hear tax reference filed against ATIR on Monday

byNaeem Ullah Tariq
31/12/2016
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: Islamabad High Court to resume hearing of an income tax reference filed against Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR) on Monday.

As IHC single bench, comprising Justice Aamer Farooq would hear the matter.

You might also like

World Bank mission reviews Sukkur Barrage project

18/06/2026

Punjab slashes annual development Budget by 40pc

18/06/2026

Earlier, the bench had adjourned hearing of the case challenging a show cause notice issued to M/s Tulip Riverside Hotel. M/s Tulip Riverside Hotel had filed case against Regional Tax Office (RTO), Islamabad.

ATIR, Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), officers of RTO including commissioner Inland Revenue, deputy commissioner Inland Revenue and commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) were made respondent in the case.

M/s Tulip Riverside Hotel had filed the case seeking restrictions for RTO, Islamabad about recovering outstanding tax amount or making any other coercive move prior to court’s directions on the issue.

M/s Tulip Riverside Hotel also stated that show cause notice mentioning outstanding tax amount was issued with mala-fide intentions. The appellant further prayed the court to bar RTO from taking coercive measure to recover the said amount.

M/s Tulip Riverside Hotel submitted before the court that the impugned order was issued under mala fide intentions and had no legal standing or authority and the court may decide on relief which it deemed appropriate in this regard. It also stated that due legal course was not followed by the department in issuing the order.

The appellant had also prayed the court to decide the case early as the appellant had to bear financial complications after the case.

The appellant had also mentioned that departmental obligations were not met amid processing the notice of recovery demand while later the adjudication did not addressed grievances of the appellant.

Related Stories

World Bank mission reviews Sukkur Barrage project

byCT Report
18/06/2026

SUKKUR: A World Bank Implementation Support Mission on Wednesday visited the Sukkur Barrage Rehabilitation Project to assess on-ground progress and...

Punjab slashes annual development Budget by 40pc

byCT Report
18/06/2026

LAHORE: The Punjab government has announced a significantly smaller Annual Development Program (ADP) for fiscal year 2026-27, allocating Rs. 752...

BMP questions budget’s ambitious tax target, fears more reliance on levies

byCT Report
18/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry’s (FPCCI) Businessmen Panel (BMP) has questioned the government’s ambitious budget...

Balochistan presents Rs1.089tr surplus budget for FY2026-27

byCT Report
18/06/2026

QUETTA: The Balochistan government on Wednesday presented a Rs1.089 trillion surplus budget for the fiscal year 2026-27, outlining major allocations...

Next Post

Senate body asks Commerce Ministry to take necessary measures to enhance exports

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.