Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Breaking News

SHC restrains FBR officials from taking adverse action against M/s Atlas Battery

byM.B. Rana
07/08/2021
in Breaking News, Karachi, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

KARACHI: A two-member bench of the Sindh High Court (SHC) restrained FBR officials from taking any adverse action against M/s Atlas Battery Limited on a petition filed against demand notice.

On 6 August 2021, during the hearing, counsel for the petitioner argues that on June 29, 2021, the assessing officer passed an order under section 161 (i) of the income tax ordinance, 2001, wherein it decided against the petitioner on a number of issues, the assessing officer thus raised a huge demand against the petitioner.

You might also like

Punjab revises property valuation rates to attract UAE & Gulf investors

05/05/2026

PTBA urges FBR to halt default surcharge on Super Tax amid legal concerns

05/05/2026

He further informs the court that the notice of demand requires the petitioner to pay the impugned demand within thirty days of its service, failing which it threatens to impose additional tax and penalty under the ordinance, the notice of demand was received on June 29, 202, hence, on July 25, 2021, the thirty-day period has already expired on July 28, 2021.

He further argues that petitioner’s appeal and stay petition remain pending before the appellant forum without any order, the petitioner is completely in the dark as to when its appeal and stay application shall be decided. The petitioner apprehends that in the absence of a stay order, the remaining respondents shall immediately initiate coercive recovery proceedings against its assets and receivable.

Citing Secretary Revenue Division, Chairman FBR, Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeal-II) and Commissioner Inland Revenue Enforcement-II Large Taxpayers Office as respondents, petitioner pleaded the court to prohibit the respondents from taking any adverse action against the petitioner on the basis of the order and notice of demand dated June 29, 2021 till the petitioner’s appeal is finally decided by respondent no 2 and for a further seven days thereafter in the event of an adverse appeal order so as to enable the petitioner to file a statutory appeal and seeks interim relief from the appellate tribunal within such period.

Related Stories

Punjab revises property valuation rates to attract UAE & Gulf investors

byCT Report
05/05/2026

LAHORE: The Punjab government has started revising property valuation rates across multiple districts in an effort to attract foreign investment,...

PTBA urges FBR to halt default surcharge on Super Tax amid legal concerns

byCT Report
05/05/2026

LAHORE: The Pakistan Tax Bar Association (PTBA) has urged the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to immediately instruct its field...

FTO dismisses Rs70m tax evasion complaint

byCT Report
05/05/2026

LAHORE: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has dismissed a complaint involving alleged tax evasion of over Rs70 million, reiterating that...

FBR waives penalties on Rs8.77b tax liability of PIA

byCT Report
05/05/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has announced a waiver of penalties and default surcharge on tax liabilities amounting...

Next Post

SECP registers 1,949 new companies in July

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.