Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Breaking News

SHC restrains FBR officials from taking adverse action against M/s Atlas Battery

byM.B. Rana
07/08/2021
in Breaking News, Karachi, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

KARACHI: A two-member bench of the Sindh High Court (SHC) restrained FBR officials from taking any adverse action against M/s Atlas Battery Limited on a petition filed against demand notice.

On 6 August 2021, during the hearing, counsel for the petitioner argues that on June 29, 2021, the assessing officer passed an order under section 161 (i) of the income tax ordinance, 2001, wherein it decided against the petitioner on a number of issues, the assessing officer thus raised a huge demand against the petitioner.

You might also like

China donates livestock vaccines for CPEC 2.0

01/10/2026

Only four new traders file returns under FBR’s fixed tax scheme, Senate panel told

01/10/2026

He further informs the court that the notice of demand requires the petitioner to pay the impugned demand within thirty days of its service, failing which it threatens to impose additional tax and penalty under the ordinance, the notice of demand was received on June 29, 202, hence, on July 25, 2021, the thirty-day period has already expired on July 28, 2021.

He further argues that petitioner’s appeal and stay petition remain pending before the appellant forum without any order, the petitioner is completely in the dark as to when its appeal and stay application shall be decided. The petitioner apprehends that in the absence of a stay order, the remaining respondents shall immediately initiate coercive recovery proceedings against its assets and receivable.

Citing Secretary Revenue Division, Chairman FBR, Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeal-II) and Commissioner Inland Revenue Enforcement-II Large Taxpayers Office as respondents, petitioner pleaded the court to prohibit the respondents from taking any adverse action against the petitioner on the basis of the order and notice of demand dated June 29, 2021 till the petitioner’s appeal is finally decided by respondent no 2 and for a further seven days thereafter in the event of an adverse appeal order so as to enable the petitioner to file a statutory appeal and seeks interim relief from the appellate tribunal within such period.

Related Stories

China donates livestock vaccines for CPEC 2.0

byCT Report
01/10/2026

ISLAMABAD: Minister for National Food Security Rana Tanveer Hussain has called upon agricultural scientists and researchers to develop focused and...

Only four new traders file returns under FBR’s fixed tax scheme, Senate panel told

byCT Report
01/10/2026

LAHORE: Only four new traders filed tax returns under the government's fixed tax scheme by the statutory deadline, prompting the...

APTMA urges govt to save textile economy

byCT Report
01/10/2026

LAHORE: All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (APTMA) in its 67th Annual General Meeting has demanded the government to save textile...

Container vessel may be leased to support exporters if cargo volumes suffice

byCT Report
01/10/2026

KARACHI: Seeking to help exports beat rising global freight charges and supply chain shortages spawned by rerouted ships, the federal...

Next Post

SECP registers 1,949 new companies in July

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.