Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Breaking News

South Punjab cotton processor’s tax refund rejected despite approval

byCT Report
15/03/2024
in Breaking News, Latest News, National
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

MULTAN: Tax authorities has rejected tax refund claims filed by South Punjab cotton processor’s despite initial approval.

According to sources, a cotton processor faced the rejection of their input tax refund by the sales tax department, despite initially securing approval for it. The rejection came after the allotted timeframe had elapsed.

You might also like

FBR redraws enforcement map to crackdown on illicit money flows

09/09/2026

FBR mandates 5pc tax on social media influencers & content creators

09/09/2026

Reportedly, the tax authority continuously raised objections to the refund of input tax, citing various concerns identified by the Computerized Risk-based Evaluation of Sales Tax (CREST). Subsequently, a show cause notice for the refund’s rejection was issued six years after the relevant period, and an assessment order was later upheld by the Commissioner Inland Revenue Appeals.

In response, the taxpayer contested the show cause notice, arguing that any exercise of jurisdiction by an executive authority beyond the period stipulated by statute is illegal. The taxpayer emphasized the importance of adhering to the timeframe set by special statutes for conducting proceedings or actions.

The taxpayer maintained that the issuance of the show cause notice for the rejection of the input tax refund beyond the initial five-year period was impermissible. They stressed that compliance with this timeframe was a mandatory requirement.

Furthermore, it was noted that the department had initiated contravention proceedings in absentia, resulting in the issuance of an assessment order that the taxpayer subsequently challenged.

The taxpayer also pointed out that despite having complete documentation to support their claim for a refund associated with zero-rated supplies, the department chose to act only after many years had passed, which they deemed unjustified.

Related Stories

FBR redraws enforcement map to crackdown on illicit money flows

byCT Report
09/09/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has overhauled how it monitors non-financial businesses and professions for money laundering and...

FBR mandates 5pc tax on social media influencers & content creators

byCT Report
09/09/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is officially taxing digital income. Consequently, the FBR will enforce a 5% Withholding...

No more office visits: MCI digitises business licences

byCT Report
09/09/2026

ISLAMABAD: Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad (MCI) has fully digitised its municipal licence services, eliminating manual processing and allowing applicants to secure...

Pakistan receives $3.66b in workers remittances in August: Khurram Schehzad

byCT Report
09/09/2026

KARACHI: Pakistan received $3.66 billion in workers’ remittances in August 2026, registering a 16.5% increase year-on-year, data from the State...

Next Post

Data collected through 7th digital census is strategic resource for data driven Policy making: Ahsan Iqbal

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.