Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Karachi

AR Associates challenges valuation of toilet soaps

byM.B. Rana
25/10/2016
in Karachi, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) has issued notices to the tax authorities and deputy attorney general of Pakistan on a petition filed by AR Associates, challenging the impugned Valuation Ruling No 863/2016, which enhanced the customs values of “toilet soaps of various brands”.

While hearing the petition, a two-member bench, comprising Justice Munib Akhtar and Justice Saeeduddin Nasir also directed them to file their respective comments on the next hearing. The court has adjourned the hearing for October 26, 2016.

You might also like

PICT enters logistics business as part of expansion strategy

27/07/2026

FPCCI criticizes SBP for keeping interest rate at 11.5%

27/07/2026

Earlier, counsel for the petitioner stated that petitioner is serious aggrieved and prejudiced by the unlawful act of the respondents, whereby the director of Customs Valuation had issued the valuation ruling for toilet soaps of various brands including the brand of the petitioner “charm” and fixed/purportedly determined the increased values without adherence to the provisions of Section 25 and 25 A of the Custom Act, 1969.

Citing Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) chariman, Customs Valuation director general and director, Customs Appraisement-East collector, Appraisement-West collector and Port Qasim collector as respondents, the petitioner pleaded the court may set aside/vacate the impugned valuation ruling.

The importer also pleaded the SHC may declare that impugned valuation ruling is illegal, unlawful, mala fide and of no legal effect and restrain the respondents from taking any coercive action against the petitioner.

Related Stories

PICT enters logistics business as part of expansion strategy

byCT Report
27/07/2026

KARACHI: Pakistan International Container Terminal Limited (PICT) has entered the logistics services business as part of its future business plan...

FPCCI criticizes SBP for keeping interest rate at 11.5%

byCT Report
27/07/2026

KARACHI: The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) has strongly criticized the State Bank of Pakistan’s (SBP)...

FTO declares higher tax deduction on teachers’ examination duty unlawful

byCT Report
27/07/2026

LAHORE The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has ruled that the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) was incorrectly applying a higher...

KP introduces 5% sales tax on cryptocurrency trading services

byCT Report
27/07/2026

PESHAWAR: The Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) has introduced a 5% sales tax on cryptocurrency and digital asset trading services,...

Next Post

SHC rejects petition challenging Valuation Ruling No 865/2016

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.