Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Karachi

Customs Appellate Tribunal rejects appeal against ONO in mis-declaration case

byM.B. Rana
08/06/2017
in Karachi, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

KARACHI: The Customs Appellate Tribunal has upheld the Order-in-Original (ONO) and rejected the appeal filed by M/S Hadi Energy Solution, Multan, challenging impugned Order-in-Original over filing mis-declaration and evasion of duty and taxes to the tune of Rs 2,352,540. A single bench of the tribunal comprising Syed Tanvir Ahmed, Member Technical-III Karachi, announced the judgment.

The tribunal in its order said: “The Customs Department has rightly classified the emanated aluminum wire under heading 8544.1900 which is accessible @US$2.5/kg attracting 25 percent duty. The documents shows that all others importers have paid duty under this heading and at higher value of US$2.5/kg. Since the declaration under section 79 (1) in WeBOC system is voluntary and on self assessment basis, therefore, the importer has been found indulged in mis-declaration of description and tried to evade duty of Rs 2,352,540. I do not see any merit in the appeal. The Customs Department’s ONO is upheld and the appeal is rejected on the merit of the case”.

You might also like

Pakistan lines up three LNG cargoes to meet peak summer power demand

04/06/2026

Pakistan, Tajikistan agree on 3-year roadmap to boost trade to $200m

04/06/2026

Earlier, the counsel for the applicant stated in its customs appeal that it has imported contain wire and filed good declaration at the rate of US$0.75/kg, however, during the examination, customs authorities alleged that importer has mis-declared the description in terms of PCT Heading, the images showed that wire was actually enameled wire and classified under PCT Heading 8544.1900 25% customs duty instead of 20%, customs department also alleged that the importer has deliberately mis-declared the description.

Citing Additional Collector of Customs (Adjudication-I) and the Collector of Customs Customs Collectorate Appraisement West as respondents, applicant had pleaded the Tribunal may declare that act of the customs department is illegal, mala fide and arbitrary and also restrain them from taking any coercive measures against it.

 

Related Stories

Pakistan lines up three LNG cargoes to meet peak summer power demand

byCT Report
04/06/2026

KARACHI: Pakistan has arranged three LNG cargoes under long-term contracts with Qatar and is seeking an additional spot cargo for...

Pakistan, Tajikistan agree on 3-year roadmap to boost trade to $200m

byCT Report
04/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and Tajikistan have agreed to a comprehensive three-year roadmap aimed at increasing bilateral trade to $200 million, while...

CCP approves acquisition of Pakistan oxygen’s liquid CO2 Plant by Pak Arab fertilizers

byCT Report
04/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has approved the proposed acquisition of the liquid carbon dioxide (LCO2) plant of...

Australian high commissioner visits SCCI

byCT Report
04/06/2026

SIALKOT: Australian High Commissioner to Pakistan Timothy Kane visited the Sialkot Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SCCI) and held an...

Next Post

Hyderabad ASO seizes goods & vehicles valued Rs72m during May

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.