Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Lahore

Customs Tribunal adapts ONO in impugned Indian raw cotton case

bySajid Nawaz
01/02/2018
in Lahore, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

LAHORE: The Customs Appellate Tribunal has modified an Order-in-Original in a case filed by the M/s Indus Dying & Manufacturers against the Collector of Customs (Preventive) and Collector of Customs (Adjudication) Lahore.

Muhammad Shabbir Gujjar heard the case in details and decided the case with remarks that the total amount of duties and taxes was already paid by the appellant so the redemption fine is reduced from Rs50000 to 20000.

You might also like

Mobile manufacturers warn of IMEI cloning, oppose used phone imports

27/04/2026

Textile exporters warn of factory closures as costs surge, refunds delayed

27/04/2026

Superintendent of Customs (Imports), Land Freight Unit (LFU) Wagha, had reported a case that M/s Indus Dying & Manufacturers imported Indian raw cotton and claimed the benefits of SRO 1125(I)/2011 for the payment of Sales Tax @ two percent instead of 13 percent.

During the course of audit, the Customs Authorities found that importer wrongly claimed the benefits of SRO and is liable to pay taxes and duties @ of 16 percent instead of two percent and also charged Rs3595060 from the importer.

After the issuance of a show cause notice, the adjudication proceedings culminated and Order-in-Original was passed with the remarks that the show cause notice established that importer M/s Indus Dying & Manufacturers is liable to pay duties and taxes.

Being aggrieved from the order, the appellant filed the case with the Customs Appellant Tribunal on the ground that the ONO was not passed on the facts but the adjudication authority passed the order without appreciation of laws so ONO is liable to be set aside. On the other side, the respondent counsel argued in favour of the department.

After hearing arguments from both parties, the Customs Appellate Tribunal decided the case and modified the ONO.

Related Stories

Mobile manufacturers warn of IMEI cloning, oppose used phone imports

byCT Report
27/04/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Mobile Phone Manufacturers Association (PMPMA) has raised concerns over the sale of smuggled, stolen and counterfeit mobile...

Textile exporters warn of factory closures as costs surge, refunds delayed

byCT Report
27/04/2026

ISLAMABAD: The textile export industry has raised concerns over rising costs and policy constraints, warning that current conditions could lead...

FBR reforms to eliminate tax evasion, non-filers

byCT Report
27/04/2026

FAISALABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is undertaking extensive reforms and structural changes aimed at completely eliminating tax evasion...

DG Valuation raises customs value on imported used iPhones

byCT Report
27/04/2026

KARACHI: Pakistan Customs has notified revised enhanced customs values for imported old and used Apple iPhones, a move that is...

Next Post

Pakistan-Italy to enhance institutional collaboration for SME development

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.