Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Lahore

Customs Tribunal sets aside ONO in seizure of generators case

bySajid Nawaz
27/10/2017
in Lahore, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

LAHORE: The Customs Appellate Tribunal has accepted an appeal filed by one Tanveer Hussain, a resident of Faisalabad, against the Additional Collector of Customs (Adjudication) and Superintendent Customs ASO, MCC Faisalabad.

A case was filed against the customs department’s actions against the appellant. As per department’s action, Staff of the Customs ASO Faisalabad recovered two foreign origin used diesel generators and one alternator which were to be installed at the poultry farm. On demand, owner of the generators could not produce any documentary proof for the legal import of said goods.

You might also like

FBR exempts certain POS-compliant footwear supplies from retail price tax

18/07/2026

Tax backlog hits 68,000 despite 24 private members inducted on monthly salaries of up to Rs2.6m; review panel formed

18/07/2026

Therefore goods were taken into possession. Tanveer Hussain appeared before the investigation officer and claimed the ownership of seized generators. After a primary investigation, goods were confiscated under Section 16 and 18 of the Customs Act-1969.

After the show cause notice, adjudication proceedings culminated and Order-In-Original was passed that the case of the department stands established and goods are ordered for outright confiscation in favor of the government.

Being aggrieved from the ONO, the appellant filed a case before the Customs Appellate Tribunal on the grounds that the actual capacity of the generators has not been determined by the expert. The ONO was passed without judicious mind was applied therefore the case is liable to be set aside.

On the other side, counsel for the respondent denied all the allegations and requested for the rejection of the appeal.

After hearing the arguments from both sides, Omer Arshed Hakeem, Member Judicial Bench-II, accepted the appeal and the impugned proceeding was quashed. The tribunal also announced that goods were impounded without legal authority.

Related Stories

FBR exempts certain POS-compliant footwear supplies from retail price tax

byCT Report
18/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has excluded certain supplies made through digitally integrated and point-of-sale-compliant channels from the...

Tax backlog hits 68,000 despite 24 private members inducted on monthly salaries of up to Rs2.6m; review panel formed

byCT Report
18/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s tax litigation backlog has climbed to around 68,000 cases despite the appointment of 24 private-sector members to the...

Bahrain pulls $30m from Pakistan bonds as Gulf war weighs on foreign investment

byCT Report
18/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: Bahrain withdrew $30 million from Pakistan’s domestic bonds during the first 10 days of FY2026-27 as the Gulf conflict...

Aurangzeb reviews digital overhaul of FBR through Faceless Centre

byCT Report
18/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: Federal Minister for Finance and Revenue, Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb, chaired a meeting to review the implementation roadmap and operational...

Next Post

FBR issues breakup report of revenue generated in First-Quarter FY2017-18

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.