Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC adjourns hearing of tax matter filed by M/s Orient Power Company

byNaeem Ullah Tariq
24/01/2017
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: A single bench of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday adjourned the hearing of a tax matter filed by M/s Orient Power Company (Private) Limited challenging a show cause notice issued by Large Taxpayers Unit, Islamabad.

The bench comprising Justice Athar Minallah heard the case and adjourned for further arguments.

You might also like

Aurangzeb takes up Pakistan’s economic performance, credit outlook with Fitch

16/10/2026

DGTT foils attempt to clear restricted goods under guise of “printed, mis-printed paper rolls”

16/10/2026

M/s Orient Power Company made ATIR, Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), officers of LTU, including commissioner Inland Revenue, deputy commissioner Inland Revenue and commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) as respondents in the case.

The company had filed the case, seeking to restrict the LTU from recovering outstanding tax amount or making any other coercive move prior to the court’s directions on the issue.

M/s Orient Power Company Private Limited also stated that show cause notice mentioning outstanding tax amount was issued with mala fide intentions. The appellant further prayed the court bar LTU from taking coercive measure to recover the said amount.

M/s Orient Power Company Private Limited submitted before the court that the impugned order was issued under mala fide intentions and had no legal standing or authority and the court may decide on relief which it deemed appropriate in this regard. It also stated that due legal course was not followed by the department in issuing the order.

The appellant had also prayed the court to decide the case early as the appellant had to bear financial complications after the case.

The appellant had also mentioned that departmental obligations were not met amid processing the notice of recovery demand while later the adjudication did not addressed the grievance.

Related Stories

Aurangzeb takes up Pakistan’s economic performance, credit outlook with Fitch

byCT Report
16/10/2026

BANGKOK: Federal Minister for Finance and Revenue Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb and the Governor of the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP)...

DGTT foils attempt to clear restricted goods under guise of “printed, mis-printed paper rolls”

byCT Report
16/10/2026

KARACHI: Directorate General of Transit Trade (DGTT) has foiled an attempt to clear restricted and high-duty goods worth hundreds of...

Lahore Appraisement East files FIR as container was swapped during transit from Karachi to Lahore

byCT Report
16/10/2026

LAHORE: Collectorate of Customs Appraisement East have registered a first information report (FIR) that a container of imported paper was...

FinMin Aurangzeb stresses export-led growth, debt sustainability

byCT Report
16/10/2026

ISLAMABAD: Federal Minister for Finance and Revenue Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb has stressed the importance of export-led growth, increasing IT exports,...

Next Post

New software helps grow sales tax collection by 50%: Dr Irshad

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.