Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC adjourns hearing of tax matter filed by M/s Orient Power Company

byNaeem Ullah Tariq
24/01/2017
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: A single bench of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday adjourned the hearing of a tax matter filed by M/s Orient Power Company (Private) Limited challenging a show cause notice issued by Large Taxpayers Unit, Islamabad.

The bench comprising Justice Athar Minallah heard the case and adjourned for further arguments.

You might also like

FBR revises customs values of sodium sulphate anhydrous vide VR No.2107/2026

25/09/2026

FBR agrees to refund tax collected under struck-down property provision

25/09/2026

M/s Orient Power Company made ATIR, Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), officers of LTU, including commissioner Inland Revenue, deputy commissioner Inland Revenue and commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) as respondents in the case.

The company had filed the case, seeking to restrict the LTU from recovering outstanding tax amount or making any other coercive move prior to the court’s directions on the issue.

M/s Orient Power Company Private Limited also stated that show cause notice mentioning outstanding tax amount was issued with mala fide intentions. The appellant further prayed the court bar LTU from taking coercive measure to recover the said amount.

M/s Orient Power Company Private Limited submitted before the court that the impugned order was issued under mala fide intentions and had no legal standing or authority and the court may decide on relief which it deemed appropriate in this regard. It also stated that due legal course was not followed by the department in issuing the order.

The appellant had also prayed the court to decide the case early as the appellant had to bear financial complications after the case.

The appellant had also mentioned that departmental obligations were not met amid processing the notice of recovery demand while later the adjudication did not addressed the grievance.

Related Stories

FBR revises customs values of sodium sulphate anhydrous vide VR No.2107/2026

byCT Report
25/09/2026

ISLAMABAD: FBR has revised customs values for imported sodium sulphate anhydrous, replacing valuation rules that had been in force for...

FBR agrees to refund tax collected under struck-down property provision

byCT Report
25/09/2026

LAHORE: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has agreed to refund tax collected on deemed income from immovable properties under...

OICCI urges investment & export reforms as IMF team visits Karachi

byCT Report
25/09/2026

KARACHI: The Overseas Investors Chamber of Commerce and Industry (OICCI) has called for Pakistan to build on recent macroeconomic stabilisation...

SBP launches Pasban Remittance Rewards

byCT Report
25/09/2026

KARACHI: The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has launched the Pasban Remittance Rewards program to encourage overseas Pakistanis to send...

Next Post

New software helps grow sales tax collection by 50%: Dr Irshad

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.