Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC disposes of tax matter filed by M/s Tulip Riverside Hotel during 3rd week of Jan

byNaeem Ullah Tariq
23/01/2017
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: A single bench of the Islamabad High Court (IHC), comprising Justice Aamer Farooq, has disposed of a tax matter involving Regional Tax Office (RTO) and M/s Tulip Hotel during third week of January 2017.

The bench directed the RTO not to take any coercive action against the petitioner. The court also directed the respondent to decide appellant’s departmental application within 30 days and submit a report before the court. ATIR, Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), officers of RTO including commissioner Inland Revenue, deputy commissioner Inland Revenue and commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) were made respondent in the case.

You might also like

Pakistani olive oil brand wins gold medal at London competition

03/07/2026

Abbasi meets Gujrat Chamber delegation

03/07/2026

M/s Tulip Riverside Hotel had filed the case seeking to restrict the RTO from recovering outstanding tax amount or making any other coercive move prior to the court’s directions on the issue.

M/s Tulip Riverside Hotel also stated that show cause notice mentioning outstanding tax amount was issued with mala-fide intentions. The appellant further prayed the court bar RTO from taking coercive measure to recover the said amount.

M/s Tulip Riverside Hotel submitted before the court that the impugned order was issued under mala fide intentions and had no legal standing or authority and the court may decide on relief which it deemed appropriate in this regard. It also stated that due legal course was not followed by the department in issuing the order.

The appellant had also prayed the court to decide the case early as the appellant had to bear financial complications after the case.

The appellant had also mentioned that departmental obligations were not met amid processing the notice of recovery demand while later the adjudication did not addressed grievances of the appellant.

Related Stories

Pakistani olive oil brand wins gold medal at London competition

byCT Report
03/07/2026

LONDON: A Pakistani premium olive oil brand has brought international recognition to the country after winning a gold medal at...

Abbasi meets Gujrat Chamber delegation

byCT Report
03/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: Federal Minister for Railways Muhammad Hanif Abbasi on Friday met with a delegation of the Gujrat Chamber of Commerce...

FBR tightens monitoring of bonded POL warehouses to prevent unauthorised fuel movement

byCT Report
03/07/2026

LAHORE: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has tightened monitoring of public bonded warehouses handling petroleum, oil and lubricants (POL)...

PM Shehbaz hails FBR for surpassing historic revenue target

byCT Report
03/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif on Thursday lauded senior officers of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) for surpassing...

Next Post

MoC seeking new international markets through active trade diplomacy

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.