Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC rejects petition challenging FBR I&I wing’s powers

byCT Report
27/04/2019
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Saturday dismissed a petition challenging the Directorate General of Intelligence and Investigation (IRI) Inland Revenue’s jurisdiction and powers.

Chief Justice of the IHC Athar Minallah gave this verdict on a petition questioning the IRI’s powers.

You might also like

NEPRA sets uniform grid charges for open access electricity consumers

08/09/2026

Qatari LNG tanker crosses Strait of Hormuz, heads to Pakistan’s Port Qasim

08/09/2026

“This court is satisfied that respondents [IRI] are vested with powers and jurisdiction to perform duties and functions under section 172 of the Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 on the basis of powers conferred vide SRO No. 115,” ruled the judge.

The petitioner, a taxpayer, had gone to the high court challenging a notice served on him by the Directorate General of Intelligence and Investigation (IRI) in pursuance of its powers under section 176 (1)(b) the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

The petitioner contended before the court that the respondent didn’t have powers and jurisdiction to issue him a notice.

However, the state lawyer said the IRI has been established by the statute itself and referred to the powers vested with it under section 176 of the Ordinance of 2001 notified vide SRO 115(1)2015 dated February 9, 2015.

He said the directorate and other subordinate designations were established under section 230 of the Ordinance of 2001.

The bench ruled: “The argument raised by the petitioner’s counsel is therefore misconceived. There is also no force in the argument that since SRO 116 has been declared ultra vires, therefore respondents are no more vested with jurisdiction under the Ordinance of 2001.”

Related Stories

NEPRA sets uniform grid charges for open access electricity consumers

byCT Report
08/09/2026

ISLAMABAD: The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) has issued its decision to introduce uniform grid charges for open access...

Qatari LNG tanker crosses Strait of Hormuz, heads to Pakistan’s Port Qasim

byCT Report
08/09/2026

SINGAPORE: The Al Marrouna LNG tanker has crossed the Strait of Hormuz and is heading towards Pakistan’s Port Qasim, marking...

CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 65

Pakistan, Oman plan sister-port link between Gwadar, Sohar to boost regional trade

byCT Report
08/09/2026

KARACHI: Pakistan and Oman are working towards establishing Gwadar Port and Oman’s Sohar Port as sister ports to strengthen maritime...

Investing in Balochistan’s Youth is investing in Pakistan’s Future: Sardar Tahir Mehmood

byCT Report
08/09/2026

ISLAMABAD: Islamabad Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ICCI) President Sardar Tahir Mehmood has called upon the business community, philanthropists and...

Next Post

Details emerge of govt's first tax amnesty scheme

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.