Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC rejects petition challenging FBR I&I wing’s powers

byCT Report
27/04/2019
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Saturday dismissed a petition challenging the Directorate General of Intelligence and Investigation (IRI) Inland Revenue’s jurisdiction and powers.

Chief Justice of the IHC Athar Minallah gave this verdict on a petition questioning the IRI’s powers.

You might also like

Pakistan, Uzbekistan move to expand trade ties, explore livestock and industrial cooperation

04/05/2026

Arif Habib-led consortium moves to acquire remaining 25pc stake in PIA

04/05/2026

“This court is satisfied that respondents [IRI] are vested with powers and jurisdiction to perform duties and functions under section 172 of the Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 on the basis of powers conferred vide SRO No. 115,” ruled the judge.

The petitioner, a taxpayer, had gone to the high court challenging a notice served on him by the Directorate General of Intelligence and Investigation (IRI) in pursuance of its powers under section 176 (1)(b) the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

The petitioner contended before the court that the respondent didn’t have powers and jurisdiction to issue him a notice.

However, the state lawyer said the IRI has been established by the statute itself and referred to the powers vested with it under section 176 of the Ordinance of 2001 notified vide SRO 115(1)2015 dated February 9, 2015.

He said the directorate and other subordinate designations were established under section 230 of the Ordinance of 2001.

The bench ruled: “The argument raised by the petitioner’s counsel is therefore misconceived. There is also no force in the argument that since SRO 116 has been declared ultra vires, therefore respondents are no more vested with jurisdiction under the Ordinance of 2001.”

Related Stories

Pakistan, Uzbekistan move to expand trade ties, explore livestock and industrial cooperation

byCT Report
04/05/2026

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and Uzbekistan agreed to deepen economic cooperation across multiple sectors, including trade, industry and investment, during a meeting...

Arif Habib-led consortium moves to acquire remaining 25pc stake in PIA

byCT Report
04/05/2026

KARACHI: The consortium led by Arif Habib Corporation Limited has notified the Privatization Commission of its intent to acquire the...

FBR clears long-pending tax refund within three weeks on FTO orders

byCT Report
04/05/2026

ISLAMABAD: In a notable example of administrative responsiveness, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Islamabad field formation has processed a...

FBR fails to submit reply in LHC petition against reward scheme

byCT Report
04/05/2026

LAHORE: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has yet to file written comments before the Lahore High Court (LHC) in...

Next Post

Details emerge of govt's first tax amnesty scheme

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.