Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Lahore

LHC seeks reply from FBR on marriage halls tax hike

byCT Report
17/08/2018
in Lahore, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Thursday directed Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to furnish a written reply to a petition challenging increase in advance tax on marriage halls and also stopped it from taking coercive measures against the defaulters.

Justice Shahid Jamil Khan issued this order on the petitions of several owners of the marriage halls, hotels, commercial lawns and clubs challenging amendment in section 236D of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 under Finance Act 2018.

You might also like

FBR revises property valuation rates across Quetta

29/08/2026

FBR grants Rangers, Frontier Corps limited customs powers along borders

29/08/2026

During the hearing, the judge expressed concern over levy of a fixed amount of advance tax on small and big functions. Lead counsel of the petitioners, AK Dogar, argued that Article 18 of the Constitution guaranteed that every citizen had the right to conduct lawful trade or business and no law could be enacted to abridge or deny the fundamental right of freedom of trade and business.

He said the Supreme Court in number judgments ruled that if any law is promulgated in derogation of fundamental rights it would be void because at the cost of fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution the executive is not empowered to frame a policy.

He contended that the previously every person running a business of marriage halls, hotels or lawns was required to pay advance tax at the rate of five per cent of the bill under section 236D of the income tax ordinance. However, he said, this section had been amended by introducing a proviso, which stated that the advance tax shall be payable in big cities at the rate of Rs 20,000 per function. The counsel pleaded that in any case even if the bill was lower the owner of a marriage hall shall still have to pay Rs20,000 per function.

Related Stories

FBR revises property valuation rates across Quetta

byCT Report
29/08/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has revised the fair market values of immovable properties across Quetta, covering urban...

FBR grants Rangers, Frontier Corps limited customs powers along borders

byCT Report
29/08/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has authorised Pakistan Rangers and Frontier Corps personnel to exercise specified functions and...

LNG prices decrease in Pakistan

byCT Report
29/08/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) on Saturday notified a significant reduction in liquefied natural gas (LNG) prices...

PHC stops 3pc tax collection from steel industry

byCT Report
29/08/2026

PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has stopped authorities from recovering a disputed 3% additional tax from a steel industry...

Next Post

Customs values of I.V. Cannula/I.V. Catheter revised

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.