Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Breaking News

M/s Atlas Battery moves SHC challenging demand notice

byM.B. Rana
02/08/2021
in Breaking News, Karachi, Latest News, Slider News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

KARACHI: M/s Atlas Battery Limited has approached the Sindh High Court (SHC) and filed a constitutional petition against demand notice and seeking restraining order from any adverse action over disputed income tax matter.

On 31 July 2021, counsel for the petitioner states that on June 29, 2021, the assessing officer passed an order under section 161 (i) of the income tax ordinance, 2001, wherein it decided against the petitioner on a number of issues, the assessing officer thus raised a huge demand against the petitioner.

You might also like

KPRA team conducts field visits in Mardan, Swabi

02/06/2026

IWCCI calls for dedicated financing for women-led enterprises

02/06/2026

He further informs the court that the notice of demand requires the petitioner to pay the impugned demand within thirty days of its service, failing which it threatens to impose additional tax and penalty under the ordinance, the notice of demand was received on June 29, 202, hence, on July 25, 2021, the thirty-day period has already expired on July 28, 2021.

He further argues that petitioner’s appeal and stay application remain pending before the appellant forum without any order, the petitioner is completely in the dark as to when its appeal and stay application shall be decided. The petitioner apprehends that in the absence of a stay order, the remaining respondents shall immediately initiate coercive recovery proceedings against its assets and receivable.

Citing secretary Revenue Division, Chairman FBR, Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeal-II) and Commissioner Inland Revenue Enforcement-II Large Taxpayers Office as respondents, petitioner pleaded the court to prohibit the respondents from taking any adverse action against the petitioner on the basis of the order and notice of demand dated June 29, 2021 till the petitioner’s appeal is finally decided by respondent no 2 and for a further seven days thereafter in the event of an adverse appeal order so as to enable the petitioner to file a statutory appeal and seeks interim relief from the appellate tribunal within such period.

Related Stories

KPRA team conducts field visits in Mardan, Swabi

byCT Report
02/06/2026

PESHAWAR: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Revenue Authority (KPRA), Mardan, and Malakand Region conducted field visits in districts of Mardan and Swabi. The...

IWCCI calls for dedicated financing for women-led enterprises

byCT Report
02/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: With the federal budget for 2026-27 due to be presented in the National Assembly shortly, Samina Fazil, founder president...

SBP expands Naya Pakistan certificates to Saudi riyal & UAE dirham

byCT Report
02/06/2026

KARACHI: The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) announced issuance of Naya Pakistan Certificates in Saudi riyal and UAE dirham, offering...

FTO ruling exposes alleged misuse of tax powers by FBR officials

byCT Report
02/06/2026

LAHORE: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) officials are systematically misusing the powers available under Section 175C of the Income...

Next Post

Customs Court approves interim challen against M/s A.H International & others in tax evasion scam

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.