Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Business

WAPDA, NEPRA Acts violation: IHC to hear plea against Rs15-40 surcharge of 950MW Neelum-Jhelum project

byadmin
24/11/2014
in Business
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has been moved against the collection of Neelum-Jhelum surcharge being collected from consumers through electricity bills every month.

The petitioner submitted in the court that the Neelum-Jhelum Surcharge, imposed through a notification on January 4, 2008 and valid till December 31, 2015, was illegally, without jurisdiction and tantamount to abuse of power.

You might also like

Pak-Italy trade witnesses over 18pc surplus in 10 months

08/06/2026

Pakistan cuts petrol price by Rs4 per litre

06/06/2026

Surcharge of Rs`15-40 is collected from consumers and it increases with units usage.

Citing the Water and Power Ministry secretary and heads of National Electric Power Regularity Authority (Nepra), Water and Power Development Authority (Wapda) and Islamabad Electric Supply Company (Iesco) as respondents, the petition said that presently electricity from the Neelum-Jhelum Power Project was neither being supplied nor utilised by the public, thus its forcible advance payment is unconstitutional.

It also states that the levy is also in violation of Article 157 (2) (b) of the Constitution which provides that a tax on consumption of electricity can only be imposed through a law and that too by the provincial government.

The petitioner also pointed out that none of the relevant laws, such as the Electricity Act 1910, Wapda Act 1958 and the Nepra Act 1997, provide for imposition of surcharge for an under-construction project.

The petitioner requested the court to declare the surcharge illegal and restrain the respondents from collecting any amount in consumers’ monthly bills.

Related Stories

Pak-Italy trade witnesses over 18pc surplus in 10 months

byCT Report
08/06/2026

ISLAMABAD, Jun 8 (APP): Pakistan’s goods and services trade with Italy witnessed a surplus of 18.41 percent during the first...

Pakistan cuts petrol price by Rs4 per litre

byCT Report
06/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has announced a reduction in petrol prices in its latest weekly fuel price review, providing some relief to...

Govt likely to cut petrol price, diesel may get costlier

byCT Report
05/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: The federal government is expected to revise petroleum prices later today amid reports of a whooping increase in high...

CCP approves acquisition of Pakistan oxygen’s liquid CO2 Plant by Pak Arab fertilizers

byCT Report
04/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has approved the proposed acquisition of the liquid carbon dioxide (LCO2) plant of...

Next Post

Pak rupee remains firm against US dollar at 101.50

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.