Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Business

WAPDA, NEPRA Acts violation: IHC to hear plea against Rs15-40 surcharge of 950MW Neelum-Jhelum project

byadmin
24/11/2014
in Business
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has been moved against the collection of Neelum-Jhelum surcharge being collected from consumers through electricity bills every month.

The petitioner submitted in the court that the Neelum-Jhelum Surcharge, imposed through a notification on January 4, 2008 and valid till December 31, 2015, was illegally, without jurisdiction and tantamount to abuse of power.

You might also like

07/09/2026

Uzbekistan-Pakistan air connectivity expands as “Centrum Air’’ launches direct Tashkent-Karachi flights

05/09/2026

Surcharge of Rs`15-40 is collected from consumers and it increases with units usage.

Citing the Water and Power Ministry secretary and heads of National Electric Power Regularity Authority (Nepra), Water and Power Development Authority (Wapda) and Islamabad Electric Supply Company (Iesco) as respondents, the petition said that presently electricity from the Neelum-Jhelum Power Project was neither being supplied nor utilised by the public, thus its forcible advance payment is unconstitutional.

It also states that the levy is also in violation of Article 157 (2) (b) of the Constitution which provides that a tax on consumption of electricity can only be imposed through a law and that too by the provincial government.

The petitioner also pointed out that none of the relevant laws, such as the Electricity Act 1910, Wapda Act 1958 and the Nepra Act 1997, provide for imposition of surcharge for an under-construction project.

The petitioner requested the court to declare the surcharge illegal and restrain the respondents from collecting any amount in consumers’ monthly bills.

Related Stories

byCT Report
07/09/2026

SECP approves reforms to boost Pakistan’s business score KARACHI: The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) has approved a...

Uzbekistan-Pakistan air connectivity expands as “Centrum Air’’ launches direct Tashkent-Karachi flights

byCT Report
05/09/2026

KARACHI: Direct air connectivity between Uzbekistan and Pakistan has further expanded with the launch of regular flights between Tashkent and...

CCP, NFA sign MoU to strengthen competition law enforcement

byCT Report
04/09/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) and the National Forensics Agency (NFA) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to...

Roosevelt Hotel counsel sees 1% chance of overturning arbitration award

byCT Report
03/09/2026

ISLAMABAD: Legal counsel for the Roosevelt Hotel has assessed the chances of successfully challenging an adverse arbitration award at just...

Next Post

Pak rupee remains firm against US dollar at 101.50

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.