Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Business

WAPDA, NEPRA Acts violation: IHC to hear plea against Rs15-40 surcharge of 950MW Neelum-Jhelum project

byadmin
24/11/2014
in Business
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has been moved against the collection of Neelum-Jhelum surcharge being collected from consumers through electricity bills every month.

The petitioner submitted in the court that the Neelum-Jhelum Surcharge, imposed through a notification on January 4, 2008 and valid till December 31, 2015, was illegally, without jurisdiction and tantamount to abuse of power.

You might also like

Sales tax chaos: Hybrid vehicle makers halt production

17/08/2026

Weekly inflation rises 0.15pc, annual rate reaches 9.11pc

15/08/2026

Surcharge of Rs`15-40 is collected from consumers and it increases with units usage.

Citing the Water and Power Ministry secretary and heads of National Electric Power Regularity Authority (Nepra), Water and Power Development Authority (Wapda) and Islamabad Electric Supply Company (Iesco) as respondents, the petition said that presently electricity from the Neelum-Jhelum Power Project was neither being supplied nor utilised by the public, thus its forcible advance payment is unconstitutional.

It also states that the levy is also in violation of Article 157 (2) (b) of the Constitution which provides that a tax on consumption of electricity can only be imposed through a law and that too by the provincial government.

The petitioner also pointed out that none of the relevant laws, such as the Electricity Act 1910, Wapda Act 1958 and the Nepra Act 1997, provide for imposition of surcharge for an under-construction project.

The petitioner requested the court to declare the surcharge illegal and restrain the respondents from collecting any amount in consumers’ monthly bills.

Related Stories

Sales tax chaos: Hybrid vehicle makers halt production

byCT Report
17/08/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) has demanded an immediate rollback of the sales tax...

Weekly inflation rises 0.15pc, annual rate reaches 9.11pc

byCT Report
15/08/2026

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s weekly inflation increased by 0.15%, pushing the annual inflation rate to 9.11%, according to the latest report released...

SECP establishes Shariah-Compliant Brokerage Segment, approves 33 Islamic Windows

byCT Report
13/08/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP), in a major breakthrough, has succeeded in establishing a dedicated Shariah-compliant...

TPL Life expands Mobilink Bank partnership to offer Shariah-compliant insurance plans

byCT Report
12/08/2026

KARACHI: TPL Life Insurance Limited has expanded its strategic partnership with Mobilink Microfinance Bank Limited (Mobilink Bank) to introduce unit-linked...

Next Post

Pak rupee remains firm against US dollar at 101.50

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.