Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Business

WAPDA, NEPRA Acts violation: IHC to hear plea against Rs15-40 surcharge of 950MW Neelum-Jhelum project

byadmin
24/11/2014
in Business
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has been moved against the collection of Neelum-Jhelum surcharge being collected from consumers through electricity bills every month.

The petitioner submitted in the court that the Neelum-Jhelum Surcharge, imposed through a notification on January 4, 2008 and valid till December 31, 2015, was illegally, without jurisdiction and tantamount to abuse of power.

You might also like

Over 10,000 new companies registered in Pakistan: SECP

18/05/2026

Sindh joins Punjab in easing market closure timings ahead of Eidul Azha

16/05/2026

Surcharge of Rs`15-40 is collected from consumers and it increases with units usage.

Citing the Water and Power Ministry secretary and heads of National Electric Power Regularity Authority (Nepra), Water and Power Development Authority (Wapda) and Islamabad Electric Supply Company (Iesco) as respondents, the petition said that presently electricity from the Neelum-Jhelum Power Project was neither being supplied nor utilised by the public, thus its forcible advance payment is unconstitutional.

It also states that the levy is also in violation of Article 157 (2) (b) of the Constitution which provides that a tax on consumption of electricity can only be imposed through a law and that too by the provincial government.

The petitioner also pointed out that none of the relevant laws, such as the Electricity Act 1910, Wapda Act 1958 and the Nepra Act 1997, provide for imposition of surcharge for an under-construction project.

The petitioner requested the court to declare the surcharge illegal and restrain the respondents from collecting any amount in consumers’ monthly bills.

Related Stories

Over 10,000 new companies registered in Pakistan: SECP

byCT Report
18/05/2026

ISLAMABAD: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan has reported a significant rise in business activity, with more than 10,500 new...

Sindh joins Punjab in easing market closure timings ahead of Eidul Azha

byCT Report
16/05/2026

KARACHI: The Sindh government on Saturday exempted shops, markets, shopping malls, hotels, restaurants, marriage halls and marquees from previously imposed...

Cotton prices surge as Pakistan’s ginning season begins in second week of May for first time

byCT Report
15/05/2026

ISLAMABAD: Cotton and lint prices surged as Pakistan’s ginning cycle began in the second week of May for the first...

Railways ML-1 upgradation project to start this year, estimated cost set at $6.66b

byCT Report
14/05/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Ministry of Railways has presented a detailed plan in the National Assembly for the upgradation of the 1,726-kilometre...

Next Post

Pak rupee remains firm against US dollar at 101.50

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.