Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Business

WAPDA, NEPRA Acts violation: IHC to hear plea against Rs15-40 surcharge of 950MW Neelum-Jhelum project

byadmin
24/11/2014
in Business
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has been moved against the collection of Neelum-Jhelum surcharge being collected from consumers through electricity bills every month.

The petitioner submitted in the court that the Neelum-Jhelum Surcharge, imposed through a notification on January 4, 2008 and valid till December 31, 2015, was illegally, without jurisdiction and tantamount to abuse of power.

You might also like

Attock Refinery plans new 50,000 bpd deep-conversion refinery alongside $600m upgrade

28/09/2026

SMEDA plans new e-commerce programme to empower Pakistani entrepreneurs

26/09/2026

Surcharge of Rs`15-40 is collected from consumers and it increases with units usage.

Citing the Water and Power Ministry secretary and heads of National Electric Power Regularity Authority (Nepra), Water and Power Development Authority (Wapda) and Islamabad Electric Supply Company (Iesco) as respondents, the petition said that presently electricity from the Neelum-Jhelum Power Project was neither being supplied nor utilised by the public, thus its forcible advance payment is unconstitutional.

It also states that the levy is also in violation of Article 157 (2) (b) of the Constitution which provides that a tax on consumption of electricity can only be imposed through a law and that too by the provincial government.

The petitioner also pointed out that none of the relevant laws, such as the Electricity Act 1910, Wapda Act 1958 and the Nepra Act 1997, provide for imposition of surcharge for an under-construction project.

The petitioner requested the court to declare the surcharge illegal and restrain the respondents from collecting any amount in consumers’ monthly bills.

Related Stories

Attock Refinery plans new 50,000 bpd deep-conversion refinery alongside $600m upgrade

byCT Report
28/09/2026

ISLAMABAD: Attock Refinery Limited (ATRL) is considering setting up a new 50,000 barrels-per-day (BPD) deep-conversion refinery alongside its planned $600...

SMEDA plans new e-commerce programme to empower Pakistani entrepreneurs

byCT Report
26/09/2026

LAHORE: The Small and Medium Enterprises Development Authority (SMEDA) and Daraz Pakistan are exploring new avenues of collaboration to help...

OGRA cuts LNG prices by up to $3.91 per MMBtu

byCT Report
25/09/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) has announced a significant reduction in liquefied natural gas (LNG) prices for...

Cutlery exports increase 17.78pc to $10.280m

byCT Report
24/09/2026

ISLAMABAD: The exports of cutlery witnessed an increase of 17.78 percent during the first two months of the current financial...

Next Post

Pak rupee remains firm against US dollar at 101.50

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.