BEIJING: Cash-strapped Star Wars fans can pick up Darth Vader figurines and light sabers for as little as $4.59. Tom Brady jerseys go for about a 10th of those on the National Football League’s store. A pair of red Beats Solo headphones can be had for just $107－about half its official price.
It’s bargains galore at Alibaba Group Holding Ltd’s Taobao: the EBay-like bazaar where buyers meet up with sellers. Billionaire Chairman Jack Ma is struggling to shake the company’s reputation as a haven for cheap knock-offs and unauthorized merchandise, 21 months after calling counterfeits cancerous. He heads into 2016 after a bruising year that saw more than $50 billion wiped off its market value amid lawsuits and criticism from Chinese and US regulators.
Cleaning up its image next year is crucial to Alibaba’s goal of winning the trust of merchants and shoppers overseas, from where Jack Ma wants to get more than half the company’s revenue within a decade. A cooling Chinese economy makes that effort even more pressing. At home, JD.com Inc is winning customers partly because it holds the inventory itself and sells directly to consumers, similar to Amazon, a business model easier to police and regulate, said Michelle Ma, an analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence.
“By now, management should have eliminated this problem,” said Cyrus Mewawalla, managing director of London-based CM Research. “The fact that they haven’t is a worrying sign for investors.”
Alibaba’s struggle with fakes and questionable products is part of a larger issue in China, where piracy is rampant and knock-offs of everything from DVDs to appliances flourish. Yet over time, the country’s growing middle class will demand higher-quality goods, placing the onus on Alibaba to clean up its act.
Alibaba makes money from Taobao through advertising revenue, with third-party merchants holding the products for sale, from toys and food to medical equipment. Since the goods aren’t in Alibaba’s possession, it’s harder to verify if they are legitimate.
Still, Alibaba says it’s trying to crack down.
Alibaba “is committed to the protection of intellectual property rights and the fight against counterfeiting,” the company said in an e-mailed statement Friday. “Counterfeiting is an issue all global e-commerce companies face, and we are doing all we can to address and fight it.”
The company has a task-force of more than 2,000 monitoring for fraud and removed 90 million product listings before its 2014 initial public offering. Brand owners can use an online complaint platform to report infringements while those accused of selling frauds have three days to refute allegations with evidence or face delisting, according to Alibaba’s website.
Alibaba has also worked with brands including Nike and Adidas to remove fake athletic shoes, watches and bags on Taobao and thousands of sellers have been penalized.
That hasn’t stopped criticism.
In December, the US Office of the Trade Representative warned the company it had to do better to stay off the “Notorious Markets” blacklist it escaped only in 2012. The federal agency issued a stern warning that Alibaba’s efforts to fight piracy and respond to complaints would be monitored in the coming year.
The regulator reported that rights holders have criticized Alibaba’s enforcement program as too slow, difficult to use, and lacking transparency. While it didn’t re-list Taobao, the USTR’s recommendations included simpler processes to register and request enforcement and reduced timelines for taking down listings and issuing penalties.
Re-joining the name-and-shame list would damage Alibaba’s reputation in the US, where its shares trade and the company is trying to cultivate relationships with retailers and entertainment companies.
While Alibaba is the biggest operator in China, that’s also made it highly dependent on its home market, which generates more than 80 percent of revenue. With the domestic economy slowing, the ability to grow in the rest of the world will be critical.
“In the next 10 years, they’re not just satisfied with the China market. They want to attract foreign merchants to sell to China,” Michelle Ma said.
The company co-founded by Jack Ma headed into 2015 as the toast of Wall Street after a record September IPO.
Four months later, China’s State Administration of Industry and Commerce issued a so-called “white paper” accusing Alibaba of allowing merchants to co-opt famous brands and sell fake wine and handbags.
While the company protested and the agency ultimately said the paper didn’t have “judicial effect,” the impact on its shares was dramatic. The stock slumped by more than 40 percent between the SAIC criticism and a record low in September.
An old headache resurfaced when Kering SA, the owner of brands like Gucci and Yves Saint Laurent, sued Alibaba for allowing copyright infringement－after withdrawing a similar complaint in 2014. The Chinese company said the lawsuit had no merit.
Then came the USTR report, which echoed criticism by the American Apparel & Footwear Association, which counts Levi Strauss & Co and Under Armour Inc among its members. Alibaba’s reluctance to stamp out counterfeiters may stem from a fear of losing customers who seek out such products to other platforms, said AAFA President Juanita Duggan.
The sheer volume of listings on e-commerce websites makes policing fakes trickier. Amazon.com Inc and EBay Inc. struggled with similar issues early on, said Sage Chandler, Senior Director, International Trade at the Consumer Technology Association.
