Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

ATIR settles complaint filed by M/s Huawei Technologies challenging tax notice

byNaeem Ullah Tariq
01/03/2017
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR) on Tuesday disposed of a complaint involving Large Taxpayers’ Unit, Islamabad.

M/s Huawei Technologies had filed the complaint remanded back to the ATIR by the Islamabad High Court. ATIR Account Member Dr Ghulam Mujtaba Bhatti heard the case. M/s Huawei Technologies had contested show cause notices issued by the field offices of Federal Board of Revenue.

You might also like

Pakistan lines up three LNG cargoes to meet peak summer power demand

04/06/2026

Pakistan, Tajikistan agree on 3-year roadmap to boost trade to $200m

04/06/2026

According to details, M/s Huawei Technologies had challenged recovery of issued to it in head of outstanding income tax by the LTU, Islamabad.

M/s Huawei Technologies had submitted that the department had issued the demand for the tax year 2013 in head of income tax under provisions of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), officers of LTU including commissioner Inland Revenue, Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) and Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR) were made respondents in the case. The bench had adjourned hearing the matter last week. This case was remanded back by the Islamabad High Court (IHC). Both the appellants had challenged different show cause notices issued by the board’s field offices during recent months. M/s Huawei Technologies prayed that the assessment order issued by the LTU officer was illegal,  unlawful and without legal grounds.

The appellant had submitted before the court that the impugned order was issued under mala fide intentions and had no legal standing or authority and the court may decide on relief which it deemed appropriate in this regard. It also stated that due legal course was not followed by the department in issuing the order.

Related Stories

Pakistan lines up three LNG cargoes to meet peak summer power demand

byCT Report
04/06/2026

KARACHI: Pakistan has arranged three LNG cargoes under long-term contracts with Qatar and is seeking an additional spot cargo for...

Pakistan, Tajikistan agree on 3-year roadmap to boost trade to $200m

byCT Report
04/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and Tajikistan have agreed to a comprehensive three-year roadmap aimed at increasing bilateral trade to $200 million, while...

CCP approves acquisition of Pakistan oxygen’s liquid CO2 Plant by Pak Arab fertilizers

byCT Report
04/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has approved the proposed acquisition of the liquid carbon dioxide (LCO2) plant of...

Australian high commissioner visits SCCI

byCT Report
04/06/2026

SIALKOT: Australian High Commissioner to Pakistan Timothy Kane visited the Sialkot Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SCCI) and held an...

Next Post

LCCI for stringent proactive measures to safeguard CPEC

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.