Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Karachi

Hearing into Rs 772 million Q-Mobile tax evasion case on 11th

bySohail Rab
08/12/2014
in Karachi, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

KARACHI: Collectorate of Customs Adjudication-I Collector Dr Farid Iqbal Qureshi heard Q-mobile tax evasion case. The MCC-Multan has alleged that the cellular company is involved in tax evasion of Rs 772 million in terms of taking undue advantage of SRO-460(I)/2013.

The departmental representative of Q-Mobile Afzal Ahmed Bhatti appeared before Dr Farid Iqbal Qureshi, while MCC-Multan Additional Collector Ghulam Mustafa and Multan Superintendent ASO Tanveer Malik pleaded the case on behalf of Pakistan Customs.

You might also like

FBR excludes FTA, PTA customs concessions from 2026 tax expenditure report

21/07/2026

Pakistan banks expected to report lower Q2 2026 profits

21/07/2026

During the hearing, the departmental representatives of MCC-Multan had come up with the strong and valid legal points which knocked down the viewpoint of departmental representative of the cellular company.

In the hearing, the departmental representatives of MCC-Multan were of the view that the cellular company was paying sales tax @ Rs 250 against the import of each smart phone while the other cellular companies, including Samsung, Blackberry and Nokia had paid sales tax @ Rs 500 on import of such smart phones which were identical to the mobile phones imported by Q mobile.

Moreover, the departmental representatives of MCC-Multan stated that when the screen size of smart phone has been increased to 5 inches from 4.2 inches, the Q mobile stopped paying sales tax @ Rs 500.

The cellular company representatives had already admitted that they had followed the criteria of screen size while ignoring other characteristics laid down in SRO-460(I)/2013.

On the other hand, the departmental representative of Q-Mobile challenged the jurisdiction of MCC-Multan by saying that the mobile phones were cleared by the MCC-Preventive Karachi and Multan Customs could not seize the mobile phones.

To which the departmental representatives of the MCC-Multan gave the reference of Section 168 of the Customs Act 1969 which said that the appropriate officer of customs can seize any goods liable to confiscation under Customs Act 1969.

The mobile phones cleared by Preventive Collectorate attract Section 32 of the Customs Act 1969 and the authorities concerned of the MCC-Multan were liable to confiscate the goods under Customs Act 1969.

Subsequently, the departmental representative came up with the objection that the customs’ authorities have nothing to do with the collection of sales tax, as this issue should be handled by Inland Revenue Services (IRS)-FBR.

On which, the representatives of the Multan Customs informed the Collector-Adjudication that Section 6 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 allows customs authorities to collect sales tax at import stage, as customs duty and all provisions of Customs Act, 1969 have been applied for collection.

During the hearing, it was repeatedly stressed by the Multan Customs that the smart phones are mentioned only in Serial C of the SRO-460 chargeable to sales tax @ Rs 500, as the serial A and B are not applicable for smart phone.

It was also stressed that SRO 460(I)/2013 was issued under Section 13 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 which deals with exemption of sales tax.

Therefore, if the importer failed to avail exemption of sales tax under Serial C of SRO 460(I)/2013 then only option available to him is to pay Sales Tax at standard rate of 16 per cent, stated by the department representatives of MCC-Multan.

Customs Adjudication-I Collector Dr Farid Iqbal Qureshi adjourned the hearing until Dec 11 after listening the viewpoints of both the parties.

The sources informed Customs Today that there was a possibility that the Customs Adjudication-I collector will decide the case in the next hearing.

 

Tags: The cellular company representatives had already admitted that they had followed the criteria of screen size while ignoring other characteristics laid down in SRO-460(I)/2013.The MCC-Multan has alleged that the cellular company is involved in tax evasion of Rs 772 million in terms of taking undue advantage of SRO-460(I)/2013.

Related Stories

FBR excludes FTA, PTA customs concessions from 2026 tax expenditure report

byCT Report
21/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has left customs duty concessions granted under Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and Preferential...

Pakistan banks expected to report lower Q2 2026 profits

byCT Report
21/07/2026

KARACHI: Pakistan’s banking sector is expected to report lower earnings in the second quarter of 2026 as the impact of...

FTO orders FBR to fix IRIS glitches blocking Rs2.3m tax credit

byCT Report
21/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has ruled that the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) cannot use technical limitations of...

FBR imposes excise duty on e-liquids used in vapes & e-cigarettes

byCT Report
21/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has for the first time brought e-liquids used in vapes and electronic cigarettes...

Next Post

Appraisement-East to award contract of Queue Management System to lowest bidder

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.