Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC adjourns hearing of tax reference filed by M/s Lafarge Pakistan against FBR

byNaeem Ullah Tariq
23/11/2016
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: Islamabad High Court on Tuesday adjourned hearing of a tax reference challenging tax recovery claim announced by the field offices of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).

IHC division bench, comprising Justice Aamer Farooq heard the case submitted by M/s Lafarge Pakistan. The bench adjourned hearing for further arguments till the next week. M/s Lafarge Pakistan had filed cases against Regional Tax Office-field office of Federal Board of Revenue.

You might also like

Govt introduces public-driven model for area development projects

06/05/2026

ICCI, Ministry of Education join hands to develop market-driven curriculum

06/05/2026

ATIR, Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), officers of RTO including commissioner Inland Revenue, deputy commissioner Inland Revenue and commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) were made respondent in the case.

M/s Lafarge Pakistan Islamabad had filed the case seeking restrictions for Regional Tax Office, Islamabad from recovering Rs 43,817,620 outstanding tax amount or making any other coercive move prior to court’s directions on the issue.

M/s Lafarge Pakistan Islamabad also stated that show cause notice mentioning outstanding tax amount was issued with mala fide intentions. The appellant further prayed the court bar RTO from taking coercive measure to recover the said amount.

M/s Lafarge Pakistan submitted before the court that the impugned order was issued under mala fide intentions and had no legal standing or authority and the court may decide on relief which it deemed appropriate in this regard. It also stated that due legal course was not followed by the department in issuing the order.

The appellant had also mentioned that departmental obligations were not met amid processing the notice of recovery demand while later the adjudication did not addressed grievances of the appellant.

The appellant had also prayed the court to decide the case early as the appellant had to bear financial complications after the case.

Related Stories

Govt introduces public-driven model for area development projects

byCT Report
06/05/2026

ISLAMABAD: Now citizens have been given the right to suggest development schemes for their areas. As per new guidelines issued...

ICCI, Ministry of Education join hands to develop market-driven curriculum

byCT Report
06/05/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training and the Islamabad Chamber of Commerce and Industry have agreed to...

PM Shehbaz directs FBR to double revenue generation from enforcement measures next year

byCT Report
06/05/2026

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif has directed the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to double revenue generation through enforcement measures...

FBR awards major penalty ‘dismissal from service’ to customs inspector Shahroz Khaliq

byCT Report
06/05/2026

LAHORE: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has dismissed a customs official from service on charges of prolonged unauthorized absence,...

Next Post

Customs Central Region collects Rs 193m FED in four months

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.