Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC moved against power delegation to FBR

byCT Report
26/08/2017
in Islamabad
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The opposition Senators have moved the Islamabad High Court (IHC) challenging substitution of term ‘federal government’ with ‘board’ in the Finance Bill 2017.

This term delegates all powers and functions of the federal government provided in the taxing statutes – to the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).

You might also like

FBR allows customs classification appeals within 30 days, sets 90-day deadline

28/10/2026

Govt to advance reforms for a stronger Construction sector: Ahad Cheema

28/10/2026

Around 32 senators belonging to the Pakistan People’s Party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), the Awami National Party, the Jamat-e-Islami, the Muttahida Quomi Movement-Pakistan, the Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid and independent senators have filed the joint petition through their counsel Mohsin Kamal advocate.

The senators including Saleem Mandvviwalla, Aitzaz Ahsan, Shahi Syed, Kamil Ali Agha, Khalida Parveen and others have cited the Federation of Pakistan, the Secretary Cabinet Division, the Secretary Ministry of Law & Justice, the Secretary Ministry of Finance and the FBR chairman as respondents.

The petitioners have contended that they were elected senators and have the mandate to protect the rights of the federating units ensuring that devolution of subjects and powers takes place within the constitutional parameters.

They said that ministries of law and finance had introduced the Finance Bill 2017 in the National Assembly whereby it was proposed to amend the Customs Act 1969, Sales Tax 1990 and Federal Excise Act 2005.

The senators have raised two basic questions before the court. First, whether the substitution of the term ‘federal government’ with ‘board’ with the prior approval of the minister-in-charge was ultra vires of the Constitution and unlawful. Secondly, whether the federal minister and agency such as Ministry of Finance and the FBR can place continued reliance on the above amendment which was being inserted through the Money Bill/Finance Act?.

Related Stories

FBR allows customs classification appeals within 30 days, sets 90-day deadline

byCT Report
28/10/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has issued Customs General Order (CGO) No. 07 of 2026, amending CGO No....

Govt to advance reforms for a stronger Construction sector: Ahad Cheema

byCT Report
28/10/2026

ISLAMABAD: Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Establishment Division Senator Ahad Cheema chaired a meeting to discuss reforms aimed at...

Mobile phone taxes face Senate scrutiny over PTA & FBR disconnect

byCT Report
28/10/2026

ISLAMABAD: Mobile phone taxes are facing heavy scrutiny over a system disconnect between PTA and FBR following a meeting of...

FBR proposes new IRIS filing rules for company financial statements

byCT Report
28/10/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has proposed that companies submit financial statements with their income tax returns only...

Next Post

Collector Adjudication issues show cause to M/s Maqsood & Brothers

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.