Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Karachi

M/s Hinopak Motors moves SHC, challenges SRO 670/2019

byM.B. Rana
06/12/2019
in Karachi, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

You might also like

FBR excludes FTA, PTA customs concessions from 2026 tax expenditure report

21/07/2026

Pakistan banks expected to report lower Q2 2026 profits

21/07/2026

KARACHI: M/s Hinopak Motors Limited approached the Sindh High Court (SHC) and filed a constitutional petition against imposition of additional duty and other taxes under the garb of SRO 670/2019 on its motor vehicles for transportation of passenger and goods including trucks, road tractors and buses etc. On 5 December 2019, counsel for the petitioner argued that petitioner is engaged in the business of assembling and distribution of motor vehicles for transportation of passenger and goods including trucks, road tractors and buses etc and being one of the leading manufactures/ assemblers of busses. He submitted that petitioner is aggrieved by the arbitrary and illegal application of SRO 670(1)/2019 dated June 28, 2019 which purports to levy, demand and collect additional customs duty on import of goods specified in first schedule to the customs act, 1969, this includes import of components for the manufacture/ assembly of vehicles by the petitioner. He further submitted that the additional customs duty imposed under SRO 670/2019 is inapplicable to imports made by the petitioner during the period of 2016 to 2021 as any duty including additional customs duty imposed under the act 1969, in excess of the maximum duty including additional customs duty as provided in tariff plan, for vehicles as well as raw material, sub component, components, assembly, sub assembly, CKD (localized and no localized), falling under respective PCT Heading is not payable. Citing secretary finance, Ministry of Industries and Production, chairman FBR, collector of Customs Appraisement West, East and Port Qasim as respondents, petitioner pleaded the court to declare that act of the respondents is illegal, mala fide and arbitrary. He further pleaded the court may no customs duty or additional customs duty or any other duty or tax could be lawfully charged, collected or demanded by the respondents on the basis of a notification which has since been superseded or repealed and is no longer in field.

Related Stories

FBR excludes FTA, PTA customs concessions from 2026 tax expenditure report

byCT Report
21/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has left customs duty concessions granted under Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and Preferential...

Pakistan banks expected to report lower Q2 2026 profits

byCT Report
21/07/2026

KARACHI: Pakistan’s banking sector is expected to report lower earnings in the second quarter of 2026 as the impact of...

FTO orders FBR to fix IRIS glitches blocking Rs2.3m tax credit

byCT Report
21/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has ruled that the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) cannot use technical limitations of...

FBR imposes excise duty on e-liquids used in vapes & e-cigarettes

byCT Report
21/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has for the first time brought e-liquids used in vapes and electronic cigarettes...

Next Post

All measures will be taken for smooth operation of IRIS system: FTO Mushtaq Sukhera

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.