Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Karachi

SHC moved against SRO No 188 (1)/2015

byM.B. Rana
04/04/2016
in Karachi, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

KARACHI: M/S Sawera Industries Cotton Ginning Pressing Factory and Oil Mills filed an application in the Sindh High Court (SHC) against SRO No 188 (1)/2015 requiring the petitioner to pay the amount of Rs 6 per 40 kilogram on all in-house and outside supply of cottonseed.

The petitioner stated that it has been running a business of ginned cotton and oil mills which is seasoned activity and manufacturing cotton lint, cottonseed, oil cake and cottonseed oil and paying all leviable taxes properly.

You might also like

DG Valuation revises import values for polyester yarn amid war crisis vide VR No.2069/2026

21/04/2026

OICCI proposes 5pc cap on withholding tax, calls for reforms

21/04/2026

According to the petitioner, a dispute of payment of Rs 6 per 40kg on supply of cottonseed arose when the Revenue Division secretary issued SRO NO 188 (1)/2015 on March 5, 2015 binding the petitioner to pay the amount of Rs 6 on all in-house and outside supply w.e.f July 1, 2014 and onwards.

The counsel for petitioner stated that his client is a cotton ginner who purchases raw phutti and after manufacturing process, it obtains two products, one is cotton lint and the other is cottonseed. The sales tax is paid on electricity used in the process of manufacturing is in terms of section 7 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. However this right has been deprived from the petitioner through issuance of said SRO, which is illegal and without any jurisdiction.

Citing Revenue Division secretary; the Hyderabad Regional Tax Office (RTO) Inland Revenue (IR) chief commissioner, and the IR Enforcement & Collecting Unit-X deputy commissioner; as the respondents, the petitioner asked the court to declare the said SRO as unconstitutional and illegal.

Related Stories

DG Valuation revises import values for polyester yarn amid war crisis vide VR No.2069/2026

byCT Report
21/04/2026

KARACHI: The Directorate General of Customs Valuation, a division of the FBR, issued Valuation Ruling No. 2069/2026 on April 16,...

OICCI proposes 5pc cap on withholding tax, calls for reforms

byCT Report
21/04/2026

KARACHI: The Overseas Investors Chambers of Commerce and Industry (OICCI) has proposed capping withholding tax rates at 5%, urging the...

Zong launches Pakistan’s first 5G facilitation Kiosk at Islamabad Airport

byCT Report
21/04/2026

ISLAMABAD: Zong, Pakistan’s leading technology services enterprise, has set a new industry benchmark by launching the country’s first dedicated 5G...

LHC allows Rs11.2b cost equalisation adjustment deduction for SNGPL in tax dispute

byCT Report
21/04/2026

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has ruled that the Cost Equalisation Adjustment claimed by Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited qualifies...

Next Post

Customs Court grants bail to alleged auto parts smuggler

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.