Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Islamabad

IHC adjourns hearing of tax matter filed by M/s Orient Power Company

byNaeem Ullah Tariq
24/01/2017
in Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: A single bench of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday adjourned the hearing of a tax matter filed by M/s Orient Power Company (Private) Limited challenging a show cause notice issued by Large Taxpayers Unit, Islamabad.

The bench comprising Justice Athar Minallah heard the case and adjourned for further arguments.

You might also like

Mobile manufacturers warn of IMEI cloning, oppose used phone imports

27/04/2026

Textile exporters warn of factory closures as costs surge, refunds delayed

27/04/2026

M/s Orient Power Company made ATIR, Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), officers of LTU, including commissioner Inland Revenue, deputy commissioner Inland Revenue and commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) as respondents in the case.

The company had filed the case, seeking to restrict the LTU from recovering outstanding tax amount or making any other coercive move prior to the court’s directions on the issue.

M/s Orient Power Company Private Limited also stated that show cause notice mentioning outstanding tax amount was issued with mala fide intentions. The appellant further prayed the court bar LTU from taking coercive measure to recover the said amount.

M/s Orient Power Company Private Limited submitted before the court that the impugned order was issued under mala fide intentions and had no legal standing or authority and the court may decide on relief which it deemed appropriate in this regard. It also stated that due legal course was not followed by the department in issuing the order.

The appellant had also prayed the court to decide the case early as the appellant had to bear financial complications after the case.

The appellant had also mentioned that departmental obligations were not met amid processing the notice of recovery demand while later the adjudication did not addressed the grievance.

Related Stories

Mobile manufacturers warn of IMEI cloning, oppose used phone imports

byCT Report
27/04/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Mobile Phone Manufacturers Association (PMPMA) has raised concerns over the sale of smuggled, stolen and counterfeit mobile...

Textile exporters warn of factory closures as costs surge, refunds delayed

byCT Report
27/04/2026

ISLAMABAD: The textile export industry has raised concerns over rising costs and policy constraints, warning that current conditions could lead...

FBR reforms to eliminate tax evasion, non-filers

byCT Report
27/04/2026

FAISALABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is undertaking extensive reforms and structural changes aimed at completely eliminating tax evasion...

DG Valuation raises customs value on imported used iPhones

byCT Report
27/04/2026

KARACHI: Pakistan Customs has notified revised enhanced customs values for imported old and used Apple iPhones, a move that is...

Next Post

New software helps grow sales tax collection by 50%: Dr Irshad

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.