Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Breaking News

FBR moves for review of verdict on fuel levy

byCustoms Today Report
January 8, 2014
in Breaking News, Islamabad, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) moved a petition in the Supreme Court, seeking review of its Dec 10, 2013, verdict against the government’s attempt to validate the collection of general sales tax (GST) on petroleum products and compressed natural gas (CNG) since July 1, 2007.

A bench headed by former chief justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry had struck down Section 3(8) of the General Sales Act, 1990, inserted by the government through the Finance Act of 2013 for protecting the sales tax collected since 2007 under the Sales Tax (Special Procedure) Rules, 2007.

You might also like

Foreign exchange: SBP reserves dip $145m to $10.16b

May 21, 2022

Weekly inflation rises with 1.42pc gain

May 21, 2022

The court ruled that 9 percent additional tax on CNG should not be charged except for the rate fixed under Section 3(1) of the Sales Tax Act. The court had also ordered the Ogra to issue a revised notification and recover 16pc sales tax already paid by the consumers within three months.

The FBR filed the review petition through Advocate Malik Shakeelur Rehman Khan, pleading review the verdict. The petition was taken up by a three-judge bench headed by Justice Jawwad S Khawaja that decided to consider the issue next week.

The FBR argued that the court had not mentioned any reason explaining how Section 3(8) was contrary to the law and the constitution in its verdict. The petition said the verdict appeared to be based on a presumption that 9pc levy purportedly was an additional tax. The judgment failed to consider the explanation to the section and therefore should be reconsidered.

It said the court had annulled the vires of Section 3(8) of the act merely on the ground that a June 21, 2013, directive of the court had not been complied with.

 

Related Stories

Foreign exchange: SBP reserves dip $145m to $10.16b

byCT Report
May 21, 2022

KARACHI: The State Bank of Pakistan’s (SBP) foreign exchange reserves fell by US$145 million in a week, data released by...

Weekly inflation rises with 1.42pc gain

byCT Report
May 21, 2022

ISLAMABAD: Inflation rose further to 1.42% weekly across the country. According to the statistics, during one week, live chicken became...

Govt to present next fiscal year budget on June 10, 2022

byCT Report
May 21, 2022

ISLAMABAD: The Federal government will present the next fiscal year budget on June 10, 2022. The document states that the...

PFIA terms ban on imported goods as blow to honest taxpayers

byCT Report
May 21, 2022

LAHORE: Pakistan FMCG Importers Association (PFIA) terming the ban on imported goods as a blow to the honest taxpaying importers...

Next Post

Man found in possession of huge foreign currency

  • Contact us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • Contact us
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.