Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Breaking News

M/s Aisha Steel Mills moves SHC challenging SRO 641/2018 & SRO 1276/2018

byM.B. Rana
01/01/2021
in Breaking News, Karachi, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) issued notices to the customs officials and deputy attorney general of Pakistan on a constitutional petition filed by Aisha Steel Mills Limited challenging SRO 641/2018 dated May 24, 2018 and SRO 1276/2018 dated October 18, 2018.

On 30 December 2020, during the hearing, counsel for the petitioner stated that petitioner is a public limited company incorporated under the company’s ordinance 1984 and is one of the largest manufacturers and suppliers of CRC manufactured from HRC, the petitioner is also registered a manufacturer of CRC sheets or coils under the sales tax act, 1990.

You might also like

FPCCI president highlights MSME role in economic growth

01/07/2026

FBR reduces regulatory duty on imported SUVs, ATVs

01/07/2026

He further submitted that, by way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the show cause notice dated Dec 10, 2020 by the Collector of Customs Adjudication on the basis of a contravention report prepared by the customs officials whereby it has been alleged that the petitioner has made supplies of hot rolled coils CRC for manufacture of cold-rolled coils CRC and galvanized iron coils GIC in violation of the regulatory regime introduced by the Ministry of Finance.

He stated that petitioner filed reply of the show cause notice that it was not possible for manufacturers such as the petitioner to verify, at the time of supply, the business activities of the consumers as the sales tax registrations or returns do not define all the business activities of the consumers and also submitted that it had been importing HRC and supplying CRC and GIC in accordance with the regulatory regime in light of the clarification of the FBR and the letters of respondent.

Citing chairman FBR, Collector of Customs Adjudication, Directorate of Port Clearance Audit South Karachi, Commissioner Inland Revenue Audit-II as respondents, petitioner pleaded the court to declare that SRO 641 AND 1276/2018 are illegal, unlawful and ultra vires the constitution and also declare that the impugned noticed has been issued without lawful authority and is of no legal effect.

Related Stories

FPCCI president highlights MSME role in economic growth

byCT Report
01/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: Atif Ikram Sheikh, President FPCCI, has apprised that the Small and Medium Enterprises Development Authority (SMEDA) and the Federation...

FBR reduces regulatory duty on imported SUVs, ATVs

byCT Report
01/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has significantly reduced the regulatory duty on imported Sport Utility Vehicles (SUVs) and...

Customs Valuation revises import values for perfumes & colognes vide VR No2094/2026

byCT Report
01/07/2026

KARACHI: The Directorate General of Customs Valuation has notified Valuation Ruling No. 2094/2026, replacing the earlier Valuation Ruling No. 1840/2024...

Pakistan’s annual inflation eases to 11.1pc in June, says PBS

byCT Report
01/07/2026

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s annual inflation eased to 11.1 per cent in June from 11.7 per cent in May, while prices declined...

Next Post

BMG, KCCI congratulate BMP’s Nasir Hayat on winning FPCCI’s elections

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.