Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Karachi

SHC seeks reply on petition filed by M/s Sattar Cotton Ginning Factory

byM.B. Rana
19/04/2016
in Karachi, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

LAHORE: The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday issued notices to the secretary Revenue Division, chief commissioner IR RTO Hyderabad, deputy collector IR, Enforcement Unit-X as well as deputy attorney general on an application filed by M/s Sattar Cotton Ginning Pressing Factory against SRO no 188 (1)/2015, requiring the petitioner to pay the amount of Rs 6/- per 40 kilogram on all in-house and outside supply of cotton seed.

A two-member bench, comprising justice Munib Akhter and Justice Abdul Malik Gaddi was hearing the application. Earlier the petitioner’s counsel stated that it has been running a ginning factory and oil mills which is seasoned activity and manufacturing cotton lint, cottonseed, oil cake and cottonseed oil and paying all leviable taxes properly.

You might also like

Afghan border closure drags Pakistan-Central Asia trade down 51pc to $219m in FY26

28/08/2026

Bejaan Resorts, South Air sign agreement

28/08/2026

According to the petitioner, a dispute of payment of Rs 6 / – per 40 kilogram on supply of cotton seed arose when the Secretary Revenue Division issued SRO NO 188 (1)/2015 on 5th March 2015 binding the petitioner to pay the amount of Rs 6 per 40 kilogram on all in-house and outside supply w.e.f 1st July 2014 and onward.

The counsel stated that petitioner is a cotton ginner who purchases raw phutti and after manufacturing process, it obtains two products, one is cotton lint and the other is cottonseed. The sales tax is paid on electricity used in the process of manufacturing in terms of section 7 of the sales tax Act,1990. However, the petitioner is deprived of this right through issuance of thee said SRO, which is illegal and without any jurisdiction.  The petitioner prayed to the court to declare the said SRO as unconstitutional and illegal.

Related Stories

Afghan border closure drags Pakistan-Central Asia trade down 51pc to $219m in FY26

byCT Report
28/08/2026

PESHAWAR: Pakistan’s bilateral trade with five Central Asian countries plunged 50.62% year-on-year to $219.125 million in FY26, as the closure...

Bejaan Resorts, South Air sign agreement

byCT Report
28/08/2026

ISLAMABAD: Bejaan Resorts and South Air (Private) Limited will formally enter into a strategic partnership aimed at strengthening air connectivity...

ICCI, NYLP host National Youth Leadership Summit 2026

byCT Report
28/08/2026

ISLAMABAD: Minister of State for Law and Justice Barrister Aqeel Malik has called upon all segments of society to play...

Serious questions raised over Rs556.8m solar deal at Pak Datacom

byCT Report
28/08/2026

LAHORE: Serious financial, administrative and corporate governance concerns have been raised over a Rs. 556.8 million solar panel transaction involving...

Next Post

Faisalabad Excise generates Rs 10.2m as cotton fee in 9 months

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.