Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Karachi

SHC seeks reply on petition filed by M/s Sattar Cotton Ginning Factory

byM.B. Rana
19/04/2016
in Karachi, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

LAHORE: The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday issued notices to the secretary Revenue Division, chief commissioner IR RTO Hyderabad, deputy collector IR, Enforcement Unit-X as well as deputy attorney general on an application filed by M/s Sattar Cotton Ginning Pressing Factory against SRO no 188 (1)/2015, requiring the petitioner to pay the amount of Rs 6/- per 40 kilogram on all in-house and outside supply of cotton seed.

A two-member bench, comprising justice Munib Akhter and Justice Abdul Malik Gaddi was hearing the application. Earlier the petitioner’s counsel stated that it has been running a ginning factory and oil mills which is seasoned activity and manufacturing cotton lint, cottonseed, oil cake and cottonseed oil and paying all leviable taxes properly.

You might also like

KP challenges exclusion of two hydropower projects from IGCEP 2025-35 in IHC

12/05/2026

FBR mulls amendments to Export Facilitation Scheme for govt’s refurbished vehicle import, re-export initiative

12/05/2026

According to the petitioner, a dispute of payment of Rs 6 / – per 40 kilogram on supply of cotton seed arose when the Secretary Revenue Division issued SRO NO 188 (1)/2015 on 5th March 2015 binding the petitioner to pay the amount of Rs 6 per 40 kilogram on all in-house and outside supply w.e.f 1st July 2014 and onward.

The counsel stated that petitioner is a cotton ginner who purchases raw phutti and after manufacturing process, it obtains two products, one is cotton lint and the other is cottonseed. The sales tax is paid on electricity used in the process of manufacturing in terms of section 7 of the sales tax Act,1990. However, the petitioner is deprived of this right through issuance of thee said SRO, which is illegal and without any jurisdiction.  The petitioner prayed to the court to declare the said SRO as unconstitutional and illegal.

Related Stories

KP challenges exclusion of two hydropower projects from IGCEP 2025-35 in IHC

byCT Report
12/05/2026

PESHAWAR: Pakhtunkhwa Energy Development Organisation (PEDO) has challenged the exclusion of two hydropower projects from the Indicative Generation Capacity Expansion...

FBR mulls amendments to Export Facilitation Scheme for govt’s refurbished vehicle import, re-export initiative

byCT Report
12/05/2026

LAHORE: The Federal Board of Revenue is preparing amendments to the Export Facilitation Scheme 2021 to support the government’s proposed...

FBR revises customs values for solar panels vide VR No.2077/2026

byCT Report
12/05/2026

KARACHI: Federal Board of Revenue on Tuesday issued fresh import values for solar panels for the assessment of customs duty...

IMF ‘urges’ Pakistan for strict monitoring of transactions in real estate sector

byCT Report
12/05/2026

ISLAMABAD: The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has urged Pakistan to strengthen monitoring mechanisms for suspicious financial transactions in the real...

Next Post

Faisalabad Excise generates Rs 10.2m as cotton fee in 9 months

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.