Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
  • Home
  • Islamabad
  • Karachi
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Customs Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Karachi

SHC seeks reply on petition filed by M/s Sattar Cotton Ginning Factory

byM.B. Rana
19/04/2016
in Karachi, Latest News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

LAHORE: The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday issued notices to the secretary Revenue Division, chief commissioner IR RTO Hyderabad, deputy collector IR, Enforcement Unit-X as well as deputy attorney general on an application filed by M/s Sattar Cotton Ginning Pressing Factory against SRO no 188 (1)/2015, requiring the petitioner to pay the amount of Rs 6/- per 40 kilogram on all in-house and outside supply of cotton seed.

A two-member bench, comprising justice Munib Akhter and Justice Abdul Malik Gaddi was hearing the application. Earlier the petitioner’s counsel stated that it has been running a ginning factory and oil mills which is seasoned activity and manufacturing cotton lint, cottonseed, oil cake and cottonseed oil and paying all leviable taxes properly.

You might also like

Chinese consortium to expand investment in Pakistan’s capital market infrastructure

15/06/2026

Banks must upload account data to FBR Hub under FY27 Bill

15/06/2026

According to the petitioner, a dispute of payment of Rs 6 / – per 40 kilogram on supply of cotton seed arose when the Secretary Revenue Division issued SRO NO 188 (1)/2015 on 5th March 2015 binding the petitioner to pay the amount of Rs 6 per 40 kilogram on all in-house and outside supply w.e.f 1st July 2014 and onward.

The counsel stated that petitioner is a cotton ginner who purchases raw phutti and after manufacturing process, it obtains two products, one is cotton lint and the other is cottonseed. The sales tax is paid on electricity used in the process of manufacturing in terms of section 7 of the sales tax Act,1990. However, the petitioner is deprived of this right through issuance of thee said SRO, which is illegal and without any jurisdiction.  The petitioner prayed to the court to declare the said SRO as unconstitutional and illegal.

Related Stories

Chinese consortium to expand investment in Pakistan’s capital market infrastructure

byCT Report
15/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: Chinese investors have reaffirmed their long-term commitment to Pakistan’s capital markets following the resolution of key regulatory matters by...

Banks must upload account data to FBR Hub under FY27 Bill

byCT Report
15/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has proposed mandatory electronic data sharing by all banks and Electronic Money Institutions...

FBR Bahawalpur Zone recovers Rs530m in record enforcement drive

byCT Report
15/06/2026

BAHAWALPUR: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Bahawalpur Zone has recovered over Rs530 million in taxes from Islamia University of...

Finance Bill 2026 expands FBR audit powers under sales tax law

byCT Report
15/06/2026

ISLAMABAD: The Finance Bill 2026 has proposed significant amendments to Section 25 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, granting Inland...

Next Post

Faisalabad Excise generates Rs 10.2m as cotton fee in 9 months

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.

No Result
View All Result
  • Transfers and Postings
  • Latest News
  • Karachi
  • Islamabad
  • Lahore
  • National
  • Chambers & Associations
  • Business
  • About Us

© 2011 Customs Today -World's first newspaper on customs. Customs Today.